陕西医学杂志
陝西醫學雜誌
협서의학잡지
SHAANXI MEDICAL JOURNAL
2014年
1期
68-70
,共3页
消化性溃疡/外科学%外科手术%腹腔镜检查%对比研究
消化性潰瘍/外科學%外科手術%腹腔鏡檢查%對比研究
소화성궤양/외과학%외과수술%복강경검사%대비연구
Pepticulcer/surgery%Surgical%Laparoscopes%Comparative study
目的:探讨腹腔镜胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔修补术的可行性及安全性。方法:对49例腹腔镜和40例开腹胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔修补患者的临床资料进行对比分析。结果:腹腔镜组与开腹组平均手术时间分别为59.28±11.01min和60.15±10.12min ,两组相比无显著性差异( P>0.05);术中出血量分别为20.41±10.07 m l和46.72±16.48 m l;术后疼痛V A S计分分别为2.2±0.9分和4.6±1.8分;术后下床活动时间、肛门排气时间、进食时间及出院时间腹腔镜组明显早于开腹组(P <0.05);腹腔镜组无切口并发症发生,开腹组3例发生盆腔脓肿。结论:与开腹手术相比,腹腔镜胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔修补术具有患者创伤小、疼痛轻、康复快、并发症少等优点。是安全、有效的治疗方法。
目的:探討腹腔鏡胃十二指腸潰瘍穿孔脩補術的可行性及安全性。方法:對49例腹腔鏡和40例開腹胃十二指腸潰瘍穿孔脩補患者的臨床資料進行對比分析。結果:腹腔鏡組與開腹組平均手術時間分彆為59.28±11.01min和60.15±10.12min ,兩組相比無顯著性差異( P>0.05);術中齣血量分彆為20.41±10.07 m l和46.72±16.48 m l;術後疼痛V A S計分分彆為2.2±0.9分和4.6±1.8分;術後下床活動時間、肛門排氣時間、進食時間及齣院時間腹腔鏡組明顯早于開腹組(P <0.05);腹腔鏡組無切口併髮癥髮生,開腹組3例髮生盆腔膿腫。結論:與開腹手術相比,腹腔鏡胃十二指腸潰瘍穿孔脩補術具有患者創傷小、疼痛輕、康複快、併髮癥少等優點。是安全、有效的治療方法。
목적:탐토복강경위십이지장궤양천공수보술적가행성급안전성。방법:대49례복강경화40례개복위십이지장궤양천공수보환자적림상자료진행대비분석。결과:복강경조여개복조평균수술시간분별위59.28±11.01min화60.15±10.12min ,량조상비무현저성차이( P>0.05);술중출혈량분별위20.41±10.07 m l화46.72±16.48 m l;술후동통V A S계분분별위2.2±0.9분화4.6±1.8분;술후하상활동시간、항문배기시간、진식시간급출원시간복강경조명현조우개복조(P <0.05);복강경조무절구병발증발생,개복조3례발생분강농종。결론:여개복수술상비,복강경위십이지장궤양천공수보술구유환자창상소、동통경、강복쾌、병발증소등우점。시안전、유효적치료방법。
Objective:To study the feasibility and safety of laparoscopy repair of perforated gastroduo-denal ulcer .Methods :The laparoscopy experience on 49 patients with perforated gastroduodenal ulcer was compare with 40 patients who had undergone open repair of perforated gastroduodenal ulcer .Results :The operative time was 59 .28 ± 11 .01 min in the laparoscopy group and 60 .15 ± 10 .12 min in the open group(P>0 .05) .The blood loss was 20 .41 ± 10 .07 ml in the laparoscopy group and 46 .72 ± 16 .48 ml in the open group(P<0 .05) .The VAS grade was 2 .2 ± 0 .9 in the laparoscopy group and 4 .6 ± 1 .8 in the open group (P<0 .05) .The postoperative hospital stay and recovery time were shorter in laparoscopy group(P<0 .05) .There was no complication in the laparoscopy group . In the open group ,three patients had pelvic abscess .Conclusion :Compared with open technique ,the laparoscopy re-pair of perforated gastroduodenal ulcer is safe and feasible ,providing the advantages of less pain ,quicker recovery and less complication .