国际眼科杂志
國際眼科雜誌
국제안과잡지
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
2014年
2期
297-299
,共3页
马平%朱英%刘雪清%格尔勒%樱峰%阿克来
馬平%硃英%劉雪清%格爾勒%櫻峰%阿剋來
마평%주영%류설청%격이륵%앵봉%아극래
Goldmann眼压计%非接触式眼压计%Schiotz 眼压计%眼压
Goldmann眼壓計%非接觸式眼壓計%Schiotz 眼壓計%眼壓
Goldmann안압계%비접촉식안압계%Schiotz 안압계%안압
Goldmann tonometer%non -contact tonometer%Schiotz tonometer%intraocular pressure
目的:比较Goldmann 眼压计、非接触式眼压计与Schiotz眼压计对维吾尔族、汉族大学生眼压测量值结果。<br> 方法:横断面研究。分别采用Goldmann眼压计、非接触式眼压计与Schiotz眼压计测量维吾尔族、汉族大学生眼压。比较两族整体间、同族不同性别间、不同眼别间三种眼压计测得的眼压值。<br> 结果:相同眼压计对维吾尔族及汉族大学生眼压测量值差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);相同眼压计对同族不同性别间眼压测量值差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);相同眼压计对不同眼别间眼压测量值差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),汉族学生比维吾尔族学生眼压测量值高(P<0.05),非接触式眼压计比 Goldmann 眼压计眼压测量值偏高( P<0.05),非接触式眼压计比Schiotz眼压计眼压测量值要小(P<0.05)。<br> 结论:同一眼压测量仪对同族不同性别间及不同眼别间无差异,汉族学生比维吾尔族学生眼压测量值高,Schiotz 眼压计眼压值测量结果显著高于非接触式眼压计,而非接触式眼压计眼压测量值高于Goldmann眼压计。
目的:比較Goldmann 眼壓計、非接觸式眼壓計與Schiotz眼壓計對維吾爾族、漢族大學生眼壓測量值結果。<br> 方法:橫斷麵研究。分彆採用Goldmann眼壓計、非接觸式眼壓計與Schiotz眼壓計測量維吾爾族、漢族大學生眼壓。比較兩族整體間、同族不同性彆間、不同眼彆間三種眼壓計測得的眼壓值。<br> 結果:相同眼壓計對維吾爾族及漢族大學生眼壓測量值差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);相同眼壓計對同族不同性彆間眼壓測量值差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);相同眼壓計對不同眼彆間眼壓測量值差異無統計學意義(P>0.05),漢族學生比維吾爾族學生眼壓測量值高(P<0.05),非接觸式眼壓計比 Goldmann 眼壓計眼壓測量值偏高( P<0.05),非接觸式眼壓計比Schiotz眼壓計眼壓測量值要小(P<0.05)。<br> 結論:同一眼壓測量儀對同族不同性彆間及不同眼彆間無差異,漢族學生比維吾爾族學生眼壓測量值高,Schiotz 眼壓計眼壓值測量結果顯著高于非接觸式眼壓計,而非接觸式眼壓計眼壓測量值高于Goldmann眼壓計。
목적:비교Goldmann 안압계、비접촉식안압계여Schiotz안압계대유오이족、한족대학생안압측량치결과。<br> 방법:횡단면연구。분별채용Goldmann안압계、비접촉식안압계여Schiotz안압계측량유오이족、한족대학생안압。비교량족정체간、동족불동성별간、불동안별간삼충안압계측득적안압치。<br> 결과:상동안압계대유오이족급한족대학생안압측량치차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);상동안압계대동족불동성별간안압측량치차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);상동안압계대불동안별간안압측량치차이무통계학의의(P>0.05),한족학생비유오이족학생안압측량치고(P<0.05),비접촉식안압계비 Goldmann 안압계안압측량치편고( P<0.05),비접촉식안압계비Schiotz안압계안압측량치요소(P<0.05)。<br> 결론:동일안압측량의대동족불동성별간급불동안별간무차이,한족학생비유오이족학생안압측량치고,Schiotz 안압계안압치측량결과현저고우비접촉식안압계,이비접촉식안압계안압측량치고우Goldmann안압계。
AIM: To compare the intraocular pressure measurements of the college students of Uyghur and Han by Goldmann tonometer, non-contact tonometer and Schiotz tonometer. <br> METHODS:This cross-sectional study measured the intraocular pressure of college students of Uyghur and Han with Goldmann tonometer, non-contact tonometer and Schiotz tonometer respectively; comparison was made in the intraocular pressure measurements between the two races, between the two genders in the same race, and between the right and left eyes by three different ophthalmotonometers. <br> RESULTS: The differences in intraocular pressure measurements by the same tonometer between college students of Uyghur and Han were statistically significant (P<0.05); the differences in the measurements between different genders in one race by the same tonometer were not statistically significant (P>0.05);the differences in the measurements between the right and left eyes with the same tonometer were not statistically significant ( P >0.05); the intraocular pressure measurements of college students of Han were higher than that of college students of Uyghur ( P<0.05 ); measurements by non-contact tonometer were higher than those by Goldmann tonometer ( P<0.05 ); measurements by non-contact tonometer were lower than those by Schiotz tonometer ( P<0.05 ) . <br> CONCLUSION: There are no differences in the measurements between the two genders and between the right and left eyes by the same tonometer; the measurements of college students of Han are higher than those of college students of Uyghur; measurements by Schiotz tonometer are significantly higher than those by non-contact tonometer; measurements by non-contact tonometer are higher than those by Goldmann tonometer.