西南林业大学学报
西南林業大學學報
서남임업대학학보
JOURNAL OF SOUTHWEST FORESTRY COLLEGE
2014年
1期
52-57
,共6页
张雨%林辉%臧卓%严恩萍%东启亮%邱琳
張雨%林輝%臧卓%嚴恩萍%東啟亮%邱琳
장우%림휘%장탁%엄은평%동계량%구림
土地利用分类%遥感%MODIS数据%信息提取%辽宁省
土地利用分類%遙感%MODIS數據%信息提取%遼寧省
토지이용분류%요감%MODIS수거%신식제취%요녕성
land-use classification%remote sensing%MODIS data%information extraction%Liaoning Province
采用最大似然法、马氏距离法、光谱角填图法、支持向量机法、神经网络法和最小距离法6种分类方法,对辽宁省2010年3-12月MODIS NDVI数据,用该数据做主成分分析的前3个主成分数据、前5个主成分数据和2010年6-10月MODIS NDVI 数据等4类数据进行土地利用分类研究。结果表明:6种分类方法中最大似然法、马氏距离法和最小距离法3种方法较适合对MODIS NDVI数据进行信息提取,其总体分类精度分别达82.63%、80.29%、79.17%,乔木林类型信息提取精度分别达81.91%、78.54%、80.02%;3种对原始数据进行变换的方法中6-10月数据效果较好,其总体分类精度最高达82.63%,乔木林信息提取的最高精度达78.54%。
採用最大似然法、馬氏距離法、光譜角填圖法、支持嚮量機法、神經網絡法和最小距離法6種分類方法,對遼寧省2010年3-12月MODIS NDVI數據,用該數據做主成分分析的前3箇主成分數據、前5箇主成分數據和2010年6-10月MODIS NDVI 數據等4類數據進行土地利用分類研究。結果錶明:6種分類方法中最大似然法、馬氏距離法和最小距離法3種方法較適閤對MODIS NDVI數據進行信息提取,其總體分類精度分彆達82.63%、80.29%、79.17%,喬木林類型信息提取精度分彆達81.91%、78.54%、80.02%;3種對原始數據進行變換的方法中6-10月數據效果較好,其總體分類精度最高達82.63%,喬木林信息提取的最高精度達78.54%。
채용최대사연법、마씨거리법、광보각전도법、지지향량궤법、신경망락법화최소거리법6충분류방법,대요녕성2010년3-12월MODIS NDVI수거,용해수거주주성분분석적전3개주성분수거、전5개주성분수거화2010년6-10월MODIS NDVI 수거등4류수거진행토지이용분류연구。결과표명:6충분류방법중최대사연법、마씨거리법화최소거리법3충방법교괄합대MODIS NDVI수거진행신식제취,기총체분류정도분별체82.63%、80.29%、79.17%,교목림류형신식제취정도분별체81.91%、78.54%、80.02%;3충대원시수거진행변환적방법중6-10월수거효과교호,기총체분류정도최고체82.63%,교목림신식제취적최고정도체78.54%。
The land-use classification in Liaoning Province was conducted with MODIS NDVI data between March and December in 2010 (by taking the top 3 principal components of MODIS NDVI data,and the top 5 prin-cipal components of MODIS NDVI data of this time duration individually),and with MODIS NDVI data from June to October in 2010 by means of six kinds of classification methods,i.e.,the Maximum Likelihood Method,the Mahalanobis Distance Method,the Spectral Angle Mapping Method,the Support Vector Machines Method,the Neural Network Method and the Minimum Distance Method.The classification results showed that the Maximum Likelihood Method,the Mahalanobis Distance Method and the Minimum Distance Method were comparatively more suitable for MODIS NDVI data information extraction,whose overall classification accuracy was 82.63%,80.29%and 79.17% individually,and whose information extraction precision of arbor forests reached 81.91%,78.54%and 80.02%,respectively.In terms of growing phases,the best results of vegetation data transformation by these three methods were obtained from June to October,whose overall classification accuracy reached 82.63%,and whose information extraction precision of arbor forests could reach 78.54%.