CAJ | 학술논문

目的：评价使用葛根芩连汤为干预措施进行临床疗效观察的非个案类中英文文献质量。方法：系统检索中国学术期刊全文数据库（ CNKI）、中国生物医学文献数据库（ CBM）、中文科技期刊全文数据库（ VIP）、万方数据库、PubMed、Embase，同时辅以手工检索以补充以上数据库之不足，检索从以上各数据库建库日起截止到2012年4月。结果：全部216篇文献中，应用随机的文献102篇，占47.22％；使用对照的文献占56.94％；仅4篇文献使用了单盲法，占1.85％。文献质量评分：0分文献27篇，1分文献84篇，2分文献4篇，3分文献7篇，4分文献1篇，5～7分文献0篇。结论：纳入研究的文献质量普遍较低，临床研究的标准化和规范化有待进一步的提高。
목적：평개사용갈근금련탕위간예조시진행림상료효관찰적비개안류중영문문헌질량。방법：계통검색중국학술기간전문수거고（ CNKI）、중국생물의학문헌수거고（ CBM）、중문과기기간전문수거고（ VIP）、만방수거고、PubMed、Embase，동시보이수공검색이보충이상수거고지불족，검색종이상각수거고건고일기절지도2012년4월。결과：전부216편문헌중，응용수궤적문헌102편，점47.22％；사용대조적문헌점56.94％；부4편문헌사용료단맹법，점1.85％。문헌질량평분：0분문헌27편，1분문헌84편，2분문헌4편，3분문헌7편，4분문헌1편，5～7분문헌0편。결론：납입연구적문헌질량보편교저，림상연구적표준화화규범화유대진일보적제고。
Objective:To evaluate the quality of the published clinical researches using Gegen Qinlian Decoction as intervention method written in Chinese/English language .Methods:Both automatic research and manual search were utilized to search clinical research pa -pers published between implementation of the databases and April 2012.The databases search included CNKI , CBM, VIP, Wanfang, Pubmed, Embas.Results:Among a total of 216 papers, 102 used randomization (47.22%), 56.94%used control method, only 4 used single blind method (1.85%).Quality scoring:27 papers score 0 point, 84 papers score 1 point, 4 papers score 2 points, 7 papers score 3 points, 1 paper score 4 points, 0 paper score between 5-7 points.Conclusion:The published clinical papers research in our stud-y is not of high quality in general , efforts should be directed to standardization and regulation of clinical research .