中华医学教育探索杂志
中華醫學教育探索雜誌
중화의학교육탐색잡지
Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
2014年
2期
153-156
,共4页
施文钧%沈利%王飞%李艳娜%闫小丽
施文鈞%瀋利%王飛%李豔娜%閆小麗
시문균%침리%왕비%리염나%염소려
以问题为基础的学习%医学病毒学%实验教学%公共卫生
以問題為基礎的學習%醫學病毒學%實驗教學%公共衛生
이문제위기출적학습%의학병독학%실험교학%공공위생
Problem-based learning%Medical virology%Experiment teaching%Public health
目的:探讨以问题为基础的学习(problem-based learning, PBL)在医学病毒学实验教学中的应用。方法将2011级临床医学专业学生随机分为2组,实验组45人(含五年制20人、七年制25人)采用PBL教学,对照组63人(含五年制38人、七年制25人)采用传统教学。对比两组学生的实验成绩、医学病毒学理论成绩和期末理论成绩,并对实验组学生行问卷调查;考试成绩采用t检验,用SPSS统计软件包进行分析。结果实验组七年制学生的医学病毒学理论成绩明显高于对照组七年制学生(P<0.05),其他成绩2组差异无统计学意义。问卷显示,实验组学生对PBL可激发兴趣、锻炼病案分析与实验设计能力、促进知识理解和掌握方面满意度高;七年制学生对PBL可提高循证和归纳总结能力、五年制学生对PBL可提高自主学习能力和演绎素材能力满意度略低。结论联系公共卫生事件的医学病毒学实验课PBL教学能够激发学生学习兴趣,促进学生掌握知识,培养其良好的公共卫生意识。但需根据五年制和七年制学生学习能力对PBL教学流程作适当调整。
目的:探討以問題為基礎的學習(problem-based learning, PBL)在醫學病毒學實驗教學中的應用。方法將2011級臨床醫學專業學生隨機分為2組,實驗組45人(含五年製20人、七年製25人)採用PBL教學,對照組63人(含五年製38人、七年製25人)採用傳統教學。對比兩組學生的實驗成績、醫學病毒學理論成績和期末理論成績,併對實驗組學生行問捲調查;攷試成績採用t檢驗,用SPSS統計軟件包進行分析。結果實驗組七年製學生的醫學病毒學理論成績明顯高于對照組七年製學生(P<0.05),其他成績2組差異無統計學意義。問捲顯示,實驗組學生對PBL可激髮興趣、鍛煉病案分析與實驗設計能力、促進知識理解和掌握方麵滿意度高;七年製學生對PBL可提高循證和歸納總結能力、五年製學生對PBL可提高自主學習能力和縯繹素材能力滿意度略低。結論聯繫公共衛生事件的醫學病毒學實驗課PBL教學能夠激髮學生學習興趣,促進學生掌握知識,培養其良好的公共衛生意識。但需根據五年製和七年製學生學習能力對PBL教學流程作適噹調整。
목적:탐토이문제위기출적학습(problem-based learning, PBL)재의학병독학실험교학중적응용。방법장2011급림상의학전업학생수궤분위2조,실험조45인(함오년제20인、칠년제25인)채용PBL교학,대조조63인(함오년제38인、칠년제25인)채용전통교학。대비량조학생적실험성적、의학병독학이론성적화기말이론성적,병대실험조학생행문권조사;고시성적채용t검험,용SPSS통계연건포진행분석。결과실험조칠년제학생적의학병독학이론성적명현고우대조조칠년제학생(P<0.05),기타성적2조차이무통계학의의。문권현시,실험조학생대PBL가격발흥취、단련병안분석여실험설계능력、촉진지식리해화장악방면만의도고;칠년제학생대PBL가제고순증화귀납총결능력、오년제학생대PBL가제고자주학습능력화연역소재능력만의도략저。결론련계공공위생사건적의학병독학실험과PBL교학능구격발학생학습흥취,촉진학생장악지식,배양기량호적공공위생의식。단수근거오년제화칠년제학생학습능력대PBL교학류정작괄당조정。
Objective To evaluate PBL teaching results in medical virology experiment course. Methods Medical students of class 2011 were randomized assigned into PBL group (n=45, 20 five-academic-year students and 25 seven-academic year students) and control group (n=63, 38 five-academic-year students and 25 seven-academic year students). Teaching effectiveness was evaluated by scores of experiment, medical virology examination and final examination. PBL group was surveyed with questionnaire. SPSS statistical software was used and t test was employed to do analysis. Results Scores in medical virology examination were higher in seven-academic-year students in PBL group than in control group and there was no difference in other two examination scores between the two groups. Survey showed that interest motivation, case analysis, experiment design and knowledge grasp-ing in PBL group were highly satisfied. However, evidence-based and generalization ability among seven-academic-year students as well as autonomous learning ability and ability to deduce material among five-academic-year students were not completed satisfied. Conclusions PBL with public health events in medical virology experiment course can develop students' intrinsic motivation, knowledge grasping and public health awareness. However, PBL methods should be adjusted to suit different academic students.