CAJ | 학술논문

从国际学术理论研究来看，对自然资源与经济增长关系研究有两种主流研究范式即“荷兰病”研究范式和“资源诅咒”研究范式。从两种研究范式的比较中可以看出，在研究对象、研究内容、研究方法、研究价值取向等方面均存在着差异。从“资源诅咒”研究范式替代“荷兰病”研究范式的本质、研究结论和价值取向，以及从广大发展中国家发展实践和研究现状上看，“荷兰病”研究范式不会简单地被“资源诅咒”研究范式所替代，至少从发展中国家视角来看，“荷兰病”研究范式仍然还有重要的理论研究价值和经济实践意义。
종국제학술이론연구래간，대자연자원여경제증장관계연구유량충주류연구범식즉“하란병”연구범식화“자원저주”연구범식。종량충연구범식적비교중가이간출，재연구대상、연구내용、연구방법、연구개치취향등방면균존재착차이。종“자원저주”연구범식체대“하란병”연구범식적본질、연구결론화개치취향，이급종엄대발전중국가발전실천화연구현상상간，“하란병”연구범식불회간단지피“자원저주”연구범식소체대，지소종발전중국가시각래간，“하란병”연구범식잉연환유중요적이론연구개치화경제실천의의。
From the view of international academic theoretical research , paradigm of research on the relationshipbetween natural resources and economic growth can be classified into Dutch Disease and Resource Curse .Differencesbetween them are in terms of research objectives, contents, methodology and value orientation.From the essence,conclusion and value orientation of the replacement of Dutch Disease with Resource Curse , the practice ofdevelopment in the developing countries and the current situation of related researches , we can see that the researchparadigm of Dutch Disease can not easily be replaced by Resource Curse ; at lease, from the view of developingcountries, the research paradigm of Dutch Disease is of great value of theoretical research and great economic prac -tical significance.