国际眼科杂志
國際眼科雜誌
국제안과잡지
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
2014年
4期
673-676
,共4页
李勇%岳章显%徐海龙%刘钊臣
李勇%嶽章顯%徐海龍%劉釗臣
리용%악장현%서해룡%류쇠신
白内障%超声乳化%小切口囊外摘除%疗效
白內障%超聲乳化%小切口囊外摘除%療效
백내장%초성유화%소절구낭외적제%료효
cataract%phacoemulsification%small incision extracapsular extraction%therapeutic effect
目的:评价超声乳化术和小切口非超声乳化囊外摘除术对老年性白内障患者的临床疗效差异以及对角膜内皮细胞的影响情况。<br> 方法:回顾性分析我院2009-01/2013-01收治的白内障复明工程患者296例,其中140例患者采用超声乳化白内障吸出术治疗,156例患者采用小切口白内障囊外摘除术治疗。分析比较两组患者治疗效果的差异以及术后角膜内皮细胞的变化情况。<br> 结果:术后3d超声乳化组患者视力和散光度均优于小切口非超声乳化组(P<0.05);两组患者手术前后角膜内皮细胞的损伤程度差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而术后1,3 mo视力情况和散光度以及术中、术后并发症差异无明显统计学差异(P>0.05)。<br> 结论:小切口非超声乳化囊外摘除术和超声乳化术治疗白内障疗效基本相当,但其有着良好的经济性,适合在基层医院以及白内障复明工程中广泛开展。
目的:評價超聲乳化術和小切口非超聲乳化囊外摘除術對老年性白內障患者的臨床療效差異以及對角膜內皮細胞的影響情況。<br> 方法:迴顧性分析我院2009-01/2013-01收治的白內障複明工程患者296例,其中140例患者採用超聲乳化白內障吸齣術治療,156例患者採用小切口白內障囊外摘除術治療。分析比較兩組患者治療效果的差異以及術後角膜內皮細胞的變化情況。<br> 結果:術後3d超聲乳化組患者視力和散光度均優于小切口非超聲乳化組(P<0.05);兩組患者手術前後角膜內皮細胞的損傷程度差異有統計學意義(P<0.05),而術後1,3 mo視力情況和散光度以及術中、術後併髮癥差異無明顯統計學差異(P>0.05)。<br> 結論:小切口非超聲乳化囊外摘除術和超聲乳化術治療白內障療效基本相噹,但其有著良好的經濟性,適閤在基層醫院以及白內障複明工程中廣汎開展。
목적:평개초성유화술화소절구비초성유화낭외적제술대노년성백내장환자적림상료효차이이급대각막내피세포적영향정황。<br> 방법:회고성분석아원2009-01/2013-01수치적백내장복명공정환자296례,기중140례환자채용초성유화백내장흡출술치료,156례환자채용소절구백내장낭외적제술치료。분석비교량조환자치료효과적차이이급술후각막내피세포적변화정황。<br> 결과:술후3d초성유화조환자시력화산광도균우우소절구비초성유화조(P<0.05);량조환자수술전후각막내피세포적손상정도차이유통계학의의(P<0.05),이술후1,3 mo시력정황화산광도이급술중、술후병발증차이무명현통계학차이(P>0.05)。<br> 결론:소절구비초성유화낭외적제술화초성유화술치료백내장료효기본상당,단기유착량호적경제성,괄합재기층의원이급백내장복명공정중엄범개전。
AIM:To evaluate the clinical therapeutic effects of senile cataract on phacoemulsification and small incision cataract surgery and the influence of corneal endothelium. <br> METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed in 296 cases of senile cataract in our hospital from Jan.2009 to Jan.2013 in the "Cataract extraction project".One hundred and forty cases underwent phacoemulsification treatment, whereas 156 cases received small incision extracapsular cataract extraction.The therapeutic efficacy and effects on corneal endothelial cells of the two groups were compared. <br> RESULTS: After 3d operation, the visual acuity and corneal astigmatism in phacoemulsification group were much better than that in small incision cataract surgery group (P<0.05), and the two groups were statistically significant differences before operation ( P <0.05 ). However, after 1 and 3mo, the acuity, astigmatism and preoperative and postoperative complications had no significant differences (P>0.05). <br> CONCLUSION: Both phacoemulsification and small incision extracapsular cataract extraction are effective methods of treatment of cataract.However, the method of small incision cataract surgery is more economic, and it is valuable in primary hospital and the “Cataract extraction project”.