重庆医学
重慶醫學
중경의학
CHONGQING MEDICAL JOURNAL
2014年
7期
772-774,781
,共4页
孙文静%沈小春%刘海燕%李平%兰丽%陈东风%兰春慧
孫文靜%瀋小春%劉海燕%李平%蘭麗%陳東風%蘭春慧
손문정%침소춘%류해연%리평%란려%진동풍%란춘혜
胃镜检查%体层摄影术%食管肿瘤%肿瘤分期
胃鏡檢查%體層攝影術%食管腫瘤%腫瘤分期
위경검사%체층섭영술%식관종류%종류분기
gastroscope%tomography%esophageal neoplasms%neoplasms staging
目的:比较超声内镜(EUS)与CT检查在食管癌术前临床分期中的准确率。方法对临床诊断为食管癌的68例患者按照随机数字表的方法随机分为EUS检查组和CT检查组,每组各34例,于术前行EUS或CT检查,并按照TNM(2003)分期标准作出诊断,与术后病理分期结果比较。结果以食管癌术后病理分期作为标准,术前EUS检查T、N分期的诊断准确率分别为Tis期0(0/2),T1期75.0%(3/4),T2期75.0%(6/8),T3期86.7%(13/15),T4期80.0%(4/5),T期总准确率为76.5%(26/34);N0期71.4%(5/7),N1期75.0%(9/12),N2期0(0/11),N3期0(0/4),N期总准确率为41.2%(14/34)。术前CT检查T、N分期的诊断准确率分别为Tis期0(0/1),T1期33.3%(2/6),T2期28.6%(2/7),T3期78.6%(11/14),T4期83.3%(5/6),T期总准确率为58.8%(20/34),与EUS检查组T期总准确率相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);N0期77.8%(7/9),N1期76.9%(10/13),N2期66.7%(4/6),N3期50.0%(3/6),N期总准确率为70.6%(24/34),与EUS检查组N期总准确率相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 EUS检查对食管癌的临床T期诊断准确率较高,而CT检查对食管癌的N期诊断准确率较高,术前采用EUS联合CT检查可能对指导术前制订治疗方案、评估预后有重要意义。
目的:比較超聲內鏡(EUS)與CT檢查在食管癌術前臨床分期中的準確率。方法對臨床診斷為食管癌的68例患者按照隨機數字錶的方法隨機分為EUS檢查組和CT檢查組,每組各34例,于術前行EUS或CT檢查,併按照TNM(2003)分期標準作齣診斷,與術後病理分期結果比較。結果以食管癌術後病理分期作為標準,術前EUS檢查T、N分期的診斷準確率分彆為Tis期0(0/2),T1期75.0%(3/4),T2期75.0%(6/8),T3期86.7%(13/15),T4期80.0%(4/5),T期總準確率為76.5%(26/34);N0期71.4%(5/7),N1期75.0%(9/12),N2期0(0/11),N3期0(0/4),N期總準確率為41.2%(14/34)。術前CT檢查T、N分期的診斷準確率分彆為Tis期0(0/1),T1期33.3%(2/6),T2期28.6%(2/7),T3期78.6%(11/14),T4期83.3%(5/6),T期總準確率為58.8%(20/34),與EUS檢查組T期總準確率相比差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);N0期77.8%(7/9),N1期76.9%(10/13),N2期66.7%(4/6),N3期50.0%(3/6),N期總準確率為70.6%(24/34),與EUS檢查組N期總準確率相比差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論 EUS檢查對食管癌的臨床T期診斷準確率較高,而CT檢查對食管癌的N期診斷準確率較高,術前採用EUS聯閤CT檢查可能對指導術前製訂治療方案、評估預後有重要意義。
목적:비교초성내경(EUS)여CT검사재식관암술전림상분기중적준학솔。방법대림상진단위식관암적68례환자안조수궤수자표적방법수궤분위EUS검사조화CT검사조,매조각34례,우술전행EUS혹CT검사,병안조TNM(2003)분기표준작출진단,여술후병리분기결과비교。결과이식관암술후병리분기작위표준,술전EUS검사T、N분기적진단준학솔분별위Tis기0(0/2),T1기75.0%(3/4),T2기75.0%(6/8),T3기86.7%(13/15),T4기80.0%(4/5),T기총준학솔위76.5%(26/34);N0기71.4%(5/7),N1기75.0%(9/12),N2기0(0/11),N3기0(0/4),N기총준학솔위41.2%(14/34)。술전CT검사T、N분기적진단준학솔분별위Tis기0(0/1),T1기33.3%(2/6),T2기28.6%(2/7),T3기78.6%(11/14),T4기83.3%(5/6),T기총준학솔위58.8%(20/34),여EUS검사조T기총준학솔상비차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);N0기77.8%(7/9),N1기76.9%(10/13),N2기66.7%(4/6),N3기50.0%(3/6),N기총준학솔위70.6%(24/34),여EUS검사조N기총준학솔상비차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론 EUS검사대식관암적림상T기진단준학솔교고,이CT검사대식관암적N기진단준학솔교고,술전채용EUS연합CT검사가능대지도술전제정치료방안、평고예후유중요의의。
Objective To evaluate the guidance value of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and CT scan in preoperative clinical staging for diagnosis and treatment of esophageal cancer .Methods 68 patients with esophageal cancer were randomly divided into EUS group and CT group using a random numbers table(34 cases in each group) .Patients in EUS group were examined by EUS , patients in CT group were examined by CT scan ,and staged according to the TNM (2003) staging system ,and were compared with surgical pathologic findings .Results The accuracy rates of T staging by EUS were 0(0/2) for Tis ,75 .0% (3/4) for T1 ,75 .0% (6/8) for T2 ,86 .7% (13/15) for T3 ,80 .0% (4/5) for T4 ,and the totle accuracy rate was 76 .5% (26/34) for T ;those of N staging were 71 .4% (5/7) for N0 ,75 .0% (9/12) for N1 ,0(0/11) for N2 ,0(0/4) for N3 ,and the totle accuracy rate was 41 .2% (14/34) for N .The accuracy rate of T staging by CT scan were 0(0/1) for Tis ,33 .3% (2/6) for T1 ,28 .6% (2/7) for T2 ,78 .6% (11/14) for T3 ,83 .3% (5/6) for T4 and the totle accuracy rate was 58 .8% (20/34) for T ,the difference was statistically significant com-pared with the EUS group(P<0 .05);those of N staging were 77 .8% (7/9) for N0 ,76 .9% (10/13) for N1 ,66 .7% (4/6) for N2 , 50 .0% (3/6) for N3 and the totle accuracy rate was 70 .6% (24/34) for N ,the difference was statistically significant compared with the EUS group (P<0 .05) .Conclusion The accuracy rate of EUS are higher for diagnosis in esophageal cancer and preoperative T staging .The accuracy rate of CT scan are higher for the preoperative N staging .EUS combined with CT scan has great significance for choosing ideal therapy plan for esophageal cancer ,and for estimating prognosis of esophageal cancer .