亚热带资源与环境学报
亞熱帶資源與環境學報
아열대자원여배경학보
JOURNAL OF SUBTROPICAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT
2014年
3期
12-19,34
,共9页
潜在蒸散发%闽江流域%修正方法%彭曼法%经验估算法
潛在蒸散髮%閩江流域%脩正方法%彭曼法%經驗估算法
잠재증산발%민강류역%수정방법%팽만법%경험고산법
potential evapotranspiration%modification methods%Penman-Monteith method%empirical estimation method
各类潜在蒸散发经验估算法具有区域性的特点,实际运用时需要进行修正。常用的修正方法是通过线性回归法对经验公式的计算结果进行修正,并没有将修正反映到经验公式中的系数上。本研究提出一种系数修正的方法,通过逐月误差比例校正来修正经验公式中的参数,称之为误差比例校正法。以FAO推荐的Penman-Monteith法为标准,比较经线性回归法、误差比例校正法2种方法修正前后6种经验估算法( Blaney-Criddle、 Hargreaves、 Hamon、 Mak-kink、 Priestley and Taylor、 Rohwer )在闽江流域的计算精度,从而对误差比例校正法的修正效果及稳健性进行探讨。结果表明:逐月误差比例校正法整体上具有较好的修正效果,可以较大程度提高6种经验方法在该区域的计算精度;常用的线性回归法虽计算较误差比例校正法稍复杂,但其修正效果及稳健性略优于误差比例校正法。
各類潛在蒸散髮經驗估算法具有區域性的特點,實際運用時需要進行脩正。常用的脩正方法是通過線性迴歸法對經驗公式的計算結果進行脩正,併沒有將脩正反映到經驗公式中的繫數上。本研究提齣一種繫數脩正的方法,通過逐月誤差比例校正來脩正經驗公式中的參數,稱之為誤差比例校正法。以FAO推薦的Penman-Monteith法為標準,比較經線性迴歸法、誤差比例校正法2種方法脩正前後6種經驗估算法( Blaney-Criddle、 Hargreaves、 Hamon、 Mak-kink、 Priestley and Taylor、 Rohwer )在閩江流域的計算精度,從而對誤差比例校正法的脩正效果及穩健性進行探討。結果錶明:逐月誤差比例校正法整體上具有較好的脩正效果,可以較大程度提高6種經驗方法在該區域的計算精度;常用的線性迴歸法雖計算較誤差比例校正法稍複雜,但其脩正效果及穩健性略優于誤差比例校正法。
각류잠재증산발경험고산법구유구역성적특점,실제운용시수요진행수정。상용적수정방법시통과선성회귀법대경험공식적계산결과진행수정,병몰유장수정반영도경험공식중적계수상。본연구제출일충계수수정적방법,통과축월오차비례교정래수정경험공식중적삼수,칭지위오차비례교정법。이FAO추천적Penman-Monteith법위표준,비교경선성회귀법、오차비례교정법2충방법수정전후6충경험고산법( Blaney-Criddle、 Hargreaves、 Hamon、 Mak-kink、 Priestley and Taylor、 Rohwer )재민강류역적계산정도,종이대오차비례교정법적수정효과급은건성진행탐토。결과표명:축월오차비례교정법정체상구유교호적수정효과,가이교대정도제고6충경험방법재해구역적계산정도;상용적선성회귀법수계산교오차비례교정법초복잡,단기수정효과급은건성략우우오차비례교정법。
As the application of different empirical equations for computing potential evapotranspira-tion ( ET0 ) has been regionally restricted , modification is needed .A commonly used modification method is to correct the results of empirical equations by liner regression without amending their coeffi -cients .This study is providing a new way to modify the coefficients using monthly relative error correc-tion, namely the relative error modification method .To study the effect and stability of the relative er-ror modification method, six different representative empirical equations , including those of Blaney-Criddle, Hargreaves, Hamon, Makkink, Priestley-Taylor and Rohwer , were compared with Penman-Monteith equation which was set as the standard for testing the effect of applicability and the stability for each equation in Minjiang River Basin .The results showed that 1 ) performances of the six empiri-cal equations could be significantly improved by the relative error modification method , and 2 ) the commonly used linear regression method performed a little better than the relative error correcting meth -od though it was a bit more complicated than the relative error modification method .