现代临床护理
現代臨床護理
현대림상호리
MODERN CLINICAL NURSING
2013年
2期
15-18
,共4页
曾英玉%胡英%曾盈盈%张美芬
曾英玉%鬍英%曾盈盈%張美芬
증영옥%호영%증영영%장미분
三级甲等综合医院%手术室护士%核心能力
三級甲等綜閤醫院%手術室護士%覈心能力
삼급갑등종합의원%수술실호사%핵심능력
first-class grade A general hospitals%nurses in operating room%core competence
目的探讨广州市某8家三级甲等综合医院手术室护士核心能力状况。方法采用中国注册护士核心能力量表对广州市某8家三级甲等综合医院408名手术室护士进行问卷调查。了解手术室护士核心能力状况。结果手术室护士核心能力总分为(161.49±3.70)分,各条目平均得分为(2.78±0.44)分;其中,条目均分位于前3位分别是法律/伦理实践(2.93±0.61)分、专业发展(2.85±0.61)分和领导能力(2.80±0.58)分,得分最低的是评判性思维/科研(2.66±0.64)分。结论广州市某8家三级甲等综合医院手术室护士核心能力处于中上水平,其中法律/伦理实践、专业发展和领导能力较强,评判性思维/科研能力较弱。
目的探討廣州市某8傢三級甲等綜閤醫院手術室護士覈心能力狀況。方法採用中國註冊護士覈心能力量錶對廣州市某8傢三級甲等綜閤醫院408名手術室護士進行問捲調查。瞭解手術室護士覈心能力狀況。結果手術室護士覈心能力總分為(161.49±3.70)分,各條目平均得分為(2.78±0.44)分;其中,條目均分位于前3位分彆是法律/倫理實踐(2.93±0.61)分、專業髮展(2.85±0.61)分和領導能力(2.80±0.58)分,得分最低的是評判性思維/科研(2.66±0.64)分。結論廣州市某8傢三級甲等綜閤醫院手術室護士覈心能力處于中上水平,其中法律/倫理實踐、專業髮展和領導能力較彊,評判性思維/科研能力較弱。
목적탐토엄주시모8가삼급갑등종합의원수술실호사핵심능력상황。방법채용중국주책호사핵심능역량표대엄주시모8가삼급갑등종합의원408명수술실호사진행문권조사。료해수술실호사핵심능력상황。결과수술실호사핵심능력총분위(161.49±3.70)분,각조목평균득분위(2.78±0.44)분;기중,조목균분위우전3위분별시법률/윤리실천(2.93±0.61)분、전업발전(2.85±0.61)분화령도능력(2.80±0.58)분,득분최저적시평판성사유/과연(2.66±0.64)분。결론엄주시모8가삼급갑등종합의원수술실호사핵심능력처우중상수평,기중법률/윤리실천、전업발전화령도능력교강,평판성사유/과연능력교약。
Objective To investigate the core competency of nurses in the operating rooms from 8 first-class grade A general hospitals in Guangzhou.Method A total of 408 nurses in the operating rooms from 8 first-class grade A general hospitals in Guangzhou were involved in the survey by completing the questionnaire of Competency Inventory for Registered Nurses.Results The total score of core competency was(161.49±3.70).The average score of different items was(2.78±0.44).The first three items scored the highest including legal/ethical practice(2.93±0.61),professional development(2.85±0.61)and leadership(2.80±0.58).The item scored the least was critical thinking(2.66 ±0.64).Conclusions The core competence of nurses in the operating rooms from 8 first-class grade A general hospitals in Guangzhou falls at the intermediate level,their strengths including legal/ethical practice, professional development and leadership.They are poor and weak at critical thinking and scientific research.