医学临床研究
醫學臨床研究
의학림상연구
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH
2013年
7期
1390-1392
,共3页
双庆翠%邓玎玎%朱丹%周治平
雙慶翠%鄧玎玎%硃丹%週治平
쌍경취%산정정%주단%주치평
肺炎/治疗%支气管肺泡灌洗
肺炎/治療%支氣管肺泡灌洗
폐염/치료%지기관폐포관세
Pneumonia/T H%Bronchoalveolar Lavage
[目的]观察支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL )联合胸腺肽α1在治疗老年医院获得性吸入性肺炎中的应用价值。[方法]对82例确诊为医院获得性吸入性肺炎的老年患者,均在全身应用抗菌药物、祛痰、营养支持等治疗的基础上,随机分为两组,治疗组42例,采用BAL 联合胸腺肽α1治疗,40例单纯行基础治疗而未予BAL和胸腺肽α1治疗者为对照组。比较两组临床疗效。[结果]治疗组与对照组在治疗前与治疗3d后临床肺部感染评分(CPIS)相比较差异无显著性( P >0.05),治疗组治疗7 d、10 d、14 d后CPIS改善优于对照组,且两组相比较差异有显著性( P <0.05);治疗组有效率85.7%,明显高于对照组62.5%,且两组相比较差异有显著性( P <0.05)。[结论]BAL联合胸腺肽α1治疗老年医院获得性吸入性肺炎能达到良好的疗效,是一种安全、实用、有效的治疗方法。
[目的]觀察支氣管肺泡灌洗(BAL )聯閤胸腺肽α1在治療老年醫院穫得性吸入性肺炎中的應用價值。[方法]對82例確診為醫院穫得性吸入性肺炎的老年患者,均在全身應用抗菌藥物、祛痰、營養支持等治療的基礎上,隨機分為兩組,治療組42例,採用BAL 聯閤胸腺肽α1治療,40例單純行基礎治療而未予BAL和胸腺肽α1治療者為對照組。比較兩組臨床療效。[結果]治療組與對照組在治療前與治療3d後臨床肺部感染評分(CPIS)相比較差異無顯著性( P >0.05),治療組治療7 d、10 d、14 d後CPIS改善優于對照組,且兩組相比較差異有顯著性( P <0.05);治療組有效率85.7%,明顯高于對照組62.5%,且兩組相比較差異有顯著性( P <0.05)。[結論]BAL聯閤胸腺肽α1治療老年醫院穫得性吸入性肺炎能達到良好的療效,是一種安全、實用、有效的治療方法。
[목적]관찰지기관폐포관세(BAL )연합흉선태α1재치료노년의원획득성흡입성폐염중적응용개치。[방법]대82례학진위의원획득성흡입성폐염적노년환자,균재전신응용항균약물、거담、영양지지등치료적기출상,수궤분위량조,치료조42례,채용BAL 연합흉선태α1치료,40례단순행기출치료이미여BAL화흉선태α1치료자위대조조。비교량조림상료효。[결과]치료조여대조조재치료전여치료3d후림상폐부감염평분(CPIS)상비교차이무현저성( P >0.05),치료조치료7 d、10 d、14 d후CPIS개선우우대조조,차량조상비교차이유현저성( P <0.05);치료조유효솔85.7%,명현고우대조조62.5%,차량조상비교차이유현저성( P <0.05)。[결론]BAL연합흉선태α1치료노년의원획득성흡입성폐염능체도량호적료효,시일충안전、실용、유효적치료방법。
[Objective] To observe the value of bronchoalveolar lavage(BAL) combined with thymosin α1 for the treatment of elderly patients with hospital-acquired aspiration pneumonia .[Methods]A total of 82 eld-erly patients diagnosed as hospital-acquired aspiration pneumonia were treated with systemic use of antibiotics , expectorant and nutritional support therapy .All patients were randomly divided into 2 groups .The treatment group( n=42) received BAL combined with thymosin α1 .The control group( n =40) only received the basic treatment without BAL and thymosin α1 .Clinical efficacy was compared between two groups .[Results]There was no significant difference in scores of CPIS (clinical pulmonary infection score) before treatment and 3 days after treatment between treatment group and control group ( P > 0 .05) .The improvement of CPIS in treatment group at 7d ,10d and 14d after treatment was obviously better than control group ,and there was significant difference( P<0 .05) .The effective rate of treatment group was obviously higher than that of con-trol group(85 .7% vs 62 .5% ) ,and there was significant difference( P <0 .05) .[Conclusion]BAL combined with thymosin α1 for the treatment of elderly patients with hospital-acquired aspiration pneumonia can achieve a good effect ,and is a safe ,practical and effective treatment method .