现代诊断与治疗
現代診斷與治療
현대진단여치료
MODERN DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT
2013年
8期
1681-1682
,共2页
多层螺旋CT%三维成像%输尿管梗阻%诊断
多層螺鏇CT%三維成像%輸尿管梗阻%診斷
다층라선CT%삼유성상%수뇨관경조%진단
Multislice spiral CT%Dimensional imaging%Ureteral obstruction%Diagnosis
目的比较B超、IVU以及多层螺旋CT三维重建技术在临床诊断输尿管梗阻上差异及三种方法在输尿管梗阻诊断中的意义。方法以我院2009年12月～2012年1月收治疗的41例输尿管梗阻患者为研究对象，对患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果定位诊断符合率组间比较，多层螺旋CT三维重建诊断的符合率明显高于B超和IVU诊断的符合率，且组间比较差异具有统计学意义，P均＜0．05；定性诊断符合率组间比较，多层螺旋CT三维重建诊断的符合率明显高于B超和IVU诊断的符合率，且组间比较差异具有统计学意义。结论在临床诊断输尿管梗阻的过程中，与B超、IVU等技术相比较，采用多层螺旋CT三维重建技术进行诊断的临床效果显著，是临床诊断输尿管梗阻的可靠选择。
目的比較B超、IVU以及多層螺鏇CT三維重建技術在臨床診斷輸尿管梗阻上差異及三種方法在輸尿管梗阻診斷中的意義。方法以我院2009年12月～2012年1月收治療的41例輸尿管梗阻患者為研究對象，對患者的臨床資料進行迴顧性分析。結果定位診斷符閤率組間比較，多層螺鏇CT三維重建診斷的符閤率明顯高于B超和IVU診斷的符閤率，且組間比較差異具有統計學意義，P均＜0．05；定性診斷符閤率組間比較，多層螺鏇CT三維重建診斷的符閤率明顯高于B超和IVU診斷的符閤率，且組間比較差異具有統計學意義。結論在臨床診斷輸尿管梗阻的過程中，與B超、IVU等技術相比較，採用多層螺鏇CT三維重建技術進行診斷的臨床效果顯著，是臨床診斷輸尿管梗阻的可靠選擇。
목적비교B초、IVU이급다층라선CT삼유중건기술재림상진단수뇨관경조상차이급삼충방법재수뇨관경조진단중적의의。방법이아원2009년12월～2012년1월수치료적41례수뇨관경조환자위연구대상，대환자적림상자료진행회고성분석。결과정위진단부합솔조간비교，다층라선CT삼유중건진단적부합솔명현고우B초화IVU진단적부합솔，차조간비교차이구유통계학의의，P균＜0．05；정성진단부합솔조간비교，다층라선CT삼유중건진단적부합솔명현고우B초화IVU진단적부합솔，차조간비교차이구유통계학의의。결론재림상진단수뇨관경조적과정중，여B초、IVU등기술상비교，채용다층라선CT삼유중건기술진행진단적림상효과현저，시림상진단수뇨관경조적가고선택。
Objective In order to further study and compare the differences of B-, IVU, and three-dimen-sional reconstruction of multislice CT technology in the clinical diagnosis of ureteral obstruction , and pro-vide guidance and basis for clinical practice .Method 41 cases of hospitalized patients with ureteral obstruc-tion in our hospital from December 2009 to January 2012 were chosen as the research object.The clinical data of the patients was taken for rte or spective analysis.Results The positioning diagnosis rates compared be-tween groups ,the compliance rate of the three-dimensional reconstruction of multislice spiral CT diagnosis coincidence rate was significantly higher than the B-and IVU diagnosis ,and compared between groups , P<0 .05 , the difference was statistically significant .The qualitative diagnosis coincidence rate compared be-tween the groups .the three-dimensional reconstruction of multislice spiral CT diagnosis coincidence rate was significantly higher than the B-ultrasound and the IVU diagnostic coincidence rate , and compared be-tween groups, P<0.05, the difference was statistically significant .Conclusion In the process of clini-cal diagnosis of ureteral obstruction , compared with B-, the IVU and other technology , the clinical efficacy of three-dimensional reconstruction of multislice CT technology for diagnosis is significant , and it is a relia-ble choice for the clinical diagnosis of ureteral obstruction .
