医药前沿
醫藥前沿
의약전연
YIAYAO QIANYAN
2013年
24期
47-48
,共2页
王广力%刘义%罗绍华%易政兵%魏天忠%王铁强
王廣力%劉義%囉紹華%易政兵%魏天忠%王鐵彊
왕엄력%류의%라소화%역정병%위천충%왕철강
医疗机构%消毒%监测
醫療機構%消毒%鑑測
의료궤구%소독%감측
Medical institution%Disinfect%Monitoring
目的了解光明医疗机构卫生消毒情况和消毒效果,提出改进措施,预防医院性传染病的传播。方法对2010年和2011年深圳市光明新区医疗机构消毒效果监测数据进行分析。结果2010-2011年监测总合格率为89.17%。2011年度合格率略高于2010年度,不同监测时间差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);监测样品中,合格率最高的是无菌器械保存液和灭菌器生物监测,合格率均为100%,合格率最低的是医院污水,合格率为66.67%,不同类别样品合格率差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);市级、区/街道级、私营、社康、个体医疗机构监测合格率分别为62.50%、94.19%、95.51%、95.46%和83.64%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论深圳市光明新区消毒监测合格率呈上升趋势,但仍需增加监督监测频次,尤其对合格率较低的医疗机构和监测样本的监测。
目的瞭解光明醫療機構衛生消毒情況和消毒效果,提齣改進措施,預防醫院性傳染病的傳播。方法對2010年和2011年深圳市光明新區醫療機構消毒效果鑑測數據進行分析。結果2010-2011年鑑測總閤格率為89.17%。2011年度閤格率略高于2010年度,不同鑑測時間差異有統計學意義(P<0.01);鑑測樣品中,閤格率最高的是無菌器械保存液和滅菌器生物鑑測,閤格率均為100%,閤格率最低的是醫院汙水,閤格率為66.67%,不同類彆樣品閤格率差異有統計學意義(P<0.01);市級、區/街道級、私營、社康、箇體醫療機構鑑測閤格率分彆為62.50%、94.19%、95.51%、95.46%和83.64%,差異有統計學意義(P<0.01)。結論深圳市光明新區消毒鑑測閤格率呈上升趨勢,但仍需增加鑑督鑑測頻次,尤其對閤格率較低的醫療機構和鑑測樣本的鑑測。
목적료해광명의료궤구위생소독정황화소독효과,제출개진조시,예방의원성전염병적전파。방법대2010년화2011년심수시광명신구의료궤구소독효과감측수거진행분석。결과2010-2011년감측총합격솔위89.17%。2011년도합격솔략고우2010년도,불동감측시간차이유통계학의의(P<0.01);감측양품중,합격솔최고적시무균기계보존액화멸균기생물감측,합격솔균위100%,합격솔최저적시의원오수,합격솔위66.67%,불동유별양품합격솔차이유통계학의의(P<0.01);시급、구/가도급、사영、사강、개체의료궤구감측합격솔분별위62.50%、94.19%、95.51%、95.46%화83.64%,차이유통계학의의(P<0.01)。결론심수시광명신구소독감측합격솔정상승추세,단잉수증가감독감측빈차,우기대합격솔교저적의료궤구화감측양본적감측。
[Objective] To understand disinfection effect in medical institutions at different levels in Guangming New District, provide effective improvement measures and prevent the prevalence of iatrogenic diseases. [Methods] Analysis was made on the sterilization monitoring data of medical institutions in Guangming New District, Shenzhen from 2010 to 2011. [Results] The overal passing rate in 2010~2011 was 89.17%. The qualified rate in 2011 was higher than in 2010, and there was a difference (P<0.01).Of the samples tested, the qualified rates of soaking solution of instrument and biological monitoring of sterilizer were the highest (100%), and the pol uted water in hospital was the lowest qualified rate 66.67%.There was a difference of the qualified rate in different samples (P<0.01). The qualified rate in medical institutions at city level, district/street level, community health service center, private and individual clinic was 62.50%, 94.19%, 95.51%, 95.46%, 83.64%. There was a difference (P<0.01). [Conclusion] The qualified rate of disinfection in medical institutions at different level was on an upward trend from 2010 to 2011, but the monitoring should be strengthened on the medical institutions and some disinfection objects which was low qualified rate.