CAJ | 학술논문

自宋至清，对于曾巩文学创作和地位评骘不一。宋代文坛上，北宋六家及其弟子认为他是文德兼备的贤者，南宋理学家接受其思想的理学特质并造就其后世理学家的形象。元代总体上对于曾巩创作给予客观肯定。明代重“道”派推重其儒家正统之风，将其推至“圣人”地位；重“法”派追求曾文谨严法度；“反对派”反对曾文“说理”。清代“桐城派”承继和发展其“义法说”，也有批判曾文内容、形式、体制等的反对论调。通过梳理各时期对曾巩的接受评价，以期还原曾巩接受史之貌。
자송지청，대우증공문학창작화지위평즐불일。송대문단상，북송륙가급기제자인위타시문덕겸비적현자，남송이학가접수기사상적이학특질병조취기후세이학가적형상。원대총체상대우증공창작급여객관긍정。명대중“도”파추중기유가정통지풍，장기추지“골인”지위；중“법”파추구증문근엄법도；“반대파”반대증문“설리”。청대“동성파”승계화발전기“의법설”，야유비판증문내용、형식、체제등적반대론조。통과소리각시기대증공적접수평개，이기환원증공접수사지모。
The appraisal from the public to the literature creation and status of Gong Zeng was quite controversial from dynasty Song to Qing. In the field of literature in Song dynasty,the six literary giants of the northern song dynasty and their disciples regarded him as an elite giant with morality and sage, and after accepting the characteristics of neo-Confucianism, new-confucianists from southern song dynasty mould a new-Confucianism for him. People from Yuan dynasty approved works of Gong Zeng objectively on the whole,and fac-tions including ones prone to“Taoism”highly respected his orthodoxy confusion idea and pushed him as a“saint”,while“Legal-ism”factions endeavored after the rigorous arrangement of Gong Zeng. Opposite factions declared against his strong theoretical articles. Tongcheng School of Qing dynasty inherited and developed his“doctrine of Yifa”,while there were some other assertions opposing the content,form and system of articles of Gong Zeng.