中国医师进修杂志
中國醫師進脩雜誌
중국의사진수잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF POSTGRADUATES OF MEDICINE
2013年
27期
27-29
,共3页
林树春%王德生%杨建国%黄建民
林樹春%王德生%楊建國%黃建民
림수춘%왕덕생%양건국%황건민
麻醉,局部%鼻中隔%内窥镜检查
痳醉,跼部%鼻中隔%內窺鏡檢查
마취,국부%비중격%내규경검사
Anesthesia,local%Nasal septum%Endoscopy
目的 观察改进局部神经阻滞在鼻中隔偏曲矫正术中的效果.方法 151例单纯行鼻中隔偏曲矫正术的患者中,72例采用常规局部神经阻滞(常规组),行蝶腭神经+筛前神经阻滞;79例采用改进局部神经阻滞(改进组),行蝶腭神经+筛前神经+切牙管神经阻滞.比较两组麻醉效果.结果 改进组和常规组未处理鼻底骨嵴患者麻醉成功率比较差异无统计学意义[100.0%(41/41)比97.3%(36/37),P>0.05];改进组处理鼻底骨嵴患者麻醉成功率明显高于常规组[92.1%(35/38)比45.7%(16/35)],差异有统计学意义(x2=18.623,P< 0.05).两组患者均未发生麻醉药过敏、中毒及一过性血压下降和/或心跳、呼吸暂停等麻醉意外.结论 根据鼻腔鼻窦感觉神经分布特点,结合鼻内镜技术,对于不需要处理鼻底骨嵴的鼻中隔偏曲矫正术,可以选择蝶腭神经+筛前神经阻滞的常规局部神经阻滞方式,对于需要处理鼻底骨嵴的鼻中隔偏曲矫正术,则首选蝶腭神经+筛前神经+切牙管神经阻滞的改进局部神经阻滞方式.
目的 觀察改進跼部神經阻滯在鼻中隔偏麯矯正術中的效果.方法 151例單純行鼻中隔偏麯矯正術的患者中,72例採用常規跼部神經阻滯(常規組),行蝶腭神經+篩前神經阻滯;79例採用改進跼部神經阻滯(改進組),行蝶腭神經+篩前神經+切牙管神經阻滯.比較兩組痳醉效果.結果 改進組和常規組未處理鼻底骨嵴患者痳醉成功率比較差異無統計學意義[100.0%(41/41)比97.3%(36/37),P>0.05];改進組處理鼻底骨嵴患者痳醉成功率明顯高于常規組[92.1%(35/38)比45.7%(16/35)],差異有統計學意義(x2=18.623,P< 0.05).兩組患者均未髮生痳醉藥過敏、中毒及一過性血壓下降和/或心跳、呼吸暫停等痳醉意外.結論 根據鼻腔鼻竇感覺神經分佈特點,結閤鼻內鏡技術,對于不需要處理鼻底骨嵴的鼻中隔偏麯矯正術,可以選擇蝶腭神經+篩前神經阻滯的常規跼部神經阻滯方式,對于需要處理鼻底骨嵴的鼻中隔偏麯矯正術,則首選蝶腭神經+篩前神經+切牙管神經阻滯的改進跼部神經阻滯方式.
목적 관찰개진국부신경조체재비중격편곡교정술중적효과.방법 151례단순행비중격편곡교정술적환자중,72례채용상규국부신경조체(상규조),행접악신경+사전신경조체;79례채용개진국부신경조체(개진조),행접악신경+사전신경+절아관신경조체.비교량조마취효과.결과 개진조화상규조미처리비저골척환자마취성공솔비교차이무통계학의의[100.0%(41/41)비97.3%(36/37),P>0.05];개진조처리비저골척환자마취성공솔명현고우상규조[92.1%(35/38)비45.7%(16/35)],차이유통계학의의(x2=18.623,P< 0.05).량조환자균미발생마취약과민、중독급일과성혈압하강화/혹심도、호흡잠정등마취의외.결론 근거비강비두감각신경분포특점,결합비내경기술,대우불수요처리비저골척적비중격편곡교정술,가이선택접악신경+사전신경조체적상규국부신경조체방식,대우수요처리비저골척적비중격편곡교정술,칙수선접악신경+사전신경+절아관신경조체적개진국부신경조체방식.
Objective To explore the effect of improved local nerve block anesthesia in correction of nasal septum surgery.Methods One hundred and fifty-one cases of patients with simply received correction of nasal septum surgery were divided into two groups,72 cases with normal local nerve block (normal group),receiving sphenopalatine and anterior ethmoidal nerve block anesthesia; 79 cases with the improved local nerve block (improved group),receiving sphenopalatine,anterior ethmoidal and incisive canal nerve block anesthesia.Two groups of anesthesia success and anesthesia effect were compared.Results The anesthesia success rates of improved group and normal group who were performed correction of nasal septum surgery without removal of the nasal bottom ridge were 100.0%(41/41) and 97.3% (36/37),there was no significant difference (P> 0.05).But for 73 cases who were performed correction of nasal septum surgery with removal of the nasal bottom ridge,the anesthesia success rate in improved group was higher than that in normal group [92.1%(35/38) vs.45.7%(16/35)],there was significant difference (x2 =18.623,P< 0.05).Conclusions Based on the distribution characteristics of sensory nerves of the nasal cavity,and combined with endoscopic techniques,the conventional sphenopalatine and anterior ethmoidal nerve block anesthesia is suitable for nasal septum surgery without removal of the nasal bottom ridge and the advanced sphenopalatine,anterior ethmoidal and incisive canal nerve block anesthesia is the first choice for nasal septum surgery with removal of the nasal bottom ridge.