中国烧伤创疡杂志
中國燒傷創瘍雜誌
중국소상창양잡지
2014年
5期
315-318
,共4页
朱树昌%龙冰%潘沁心%付金%唐丽佳%李伟建
硃樹昌%龍冰%潘沁心%付金%唐麗佳%李偉建
주수창%룡빙%반심심%부금%당려가%리위건
中药汤剂%原位再生复原技术%湿润烧伤膏%创疡贴%大面积烧伤%残余创面
中藥湯劑%原位再生複原技術%濕潤燒傷膏%創瘍貼%大麵積燒傷%殘餘創麵
중약탕제%원위재생복원기술%습윤소상고%창양첩%대면적소상%잔여창면
TCM Decoction,In Situ Regenerative Restoration Technology%MEBO Ointment,Wound and Ulcer Dressings%Extensive Burns%Residual Wounds
目的:对比观察中药汤剂联合皮肤原位再生复原技术治疗大面积烧伤后期残余创面的临床疗效。方法将2011年1月-2012年12月收治的65例大面积烧伤后期残余创面患者随机分为两组,治疗组(33例)患者在口服中药汤剂的同时,创面采用湿润烧伤膏和创疡贴包扎换药治疗,根据分泌物的多少,每日换药1~2次;对照组(32例)患者单纯应用1%的磺胺嘧啶银霜药纱包扎换药治疗,每日1次。对比观察两组患者的创面治愈率、有效率及安全性。结果治疗组患者的有效率为90.9%,对照组患者的有效率为68.7%,两组对比, P<0.05,差异具有统计学意义;两组患者在治疗过程中均未发生不良反应,安全性无统计学差异。结论中药汤剂联合皮肤原位再生复原技术治疗大面积烧伤后期残余创面安全、有效,可提高创面治愈率,值得临床推广应用。
目的:對比觀察中藥湯劑聯閤皮膚原位再生複原技術治療大麵積燒傷後期殘餘創麵的臨床療效。方法將2011年1月-2012年12月收治的65例大麵積燒傷後期殘餘創麵患者隨機分為兩組,治療組(33例)患者在口服中藥湯劑的同時,創麵採用濕潤燒傷膏和創瘍貼包扎換藥治療,根據分泌物的多少,每日換藥1~2次;對照組(32例)患者單純應用1%的磺胺嘧啶銀霜藥紗包扎換藥治療,每日1次。對比觀察兩組患者的創麵治愈率、有效率及安全性。結果治療組患者的有效率為90.9%,對照組患者的有效率為68.7%,兩組對比, P<0.05,差異具有統計學意義;兩組患者在治療過程中均未髮生不良反應,安全性無統計學差異。結論中藥湯劑聯閤皮膚原位再生複原技術治療大麵積燒傷後期殘餘創麵安全、有效,可提高創麵治愈率,值得臨床推廣應用。
목적:대비관찰중약탕제연합피부원위재생복원기술치료대면적소상후기잔여창면적림상료효。방법장2011년1월-2012년12월수치적65례대면적소상후기잔여창면환자수궤분위량조,치료조(33례)환자재구복중약탕제적동시,창면채용습윤소상고화창양첩포찰환약치료,근거분비물적다소,매일환약1~2차;대조조(32례)환자단순응용1%적광알밀정은상약사포찰환약치료,매일1차。대비관찰량조환자적창면치유솔、유효솔급안전성。결과치료조환자적유효솔위90.9%,대조조환자적유효솔위68.7%,량조대비, P<0.05,차이구유통계학의의;량조환자재치료과정중균미발생불량반응,안전성무통계학차이。결론중약탕제연합피부원위재생복원기술치료대면적소상후기잔여창면안전、유효,가제고창면치유솔,치득림상추엄응용。
Objective To observe the clinical effect of treating residual wounds of later phase extensive burns with in situ regenerative restoration technology combined with TCM decoction .Methods Sixty-five patients with such wounds admitted from January 2011 to December 2012 were divided randomly into two groups .The patients in Treatment Group (33 cases), at the same time of taking TCM decoction , were treated with bandaging dressing change of MEBO ointment and wound and ulcer dressing , 1 to 2 times a day based on volume of exudation .Patients in Control Group ( 32 cases ) were treated with1%SD-Ag cream gauze bandaging only , dressing changed once a day .The healing rate , effective rate and safe-ty of the two groups were observedcomparatively .Results Effective rate for patients in Treatment Group is 90.9%, and that for Control Group is 68.7%, in comparison , the effect of Treatment Group is obviously better than that of Control Group ( P<0.05 ) .All patients in both groups had no adverse effect , statistically , there was no difference in safety .Con-clusion It is safe and effective to treat residual wounds of later phase extensive burns with in situ regenerative restoration technology combined with TCM decoction , which can help improve healing rate and is worth being promoted clinically .