河海大学学报(自然科学版)
河海大學學報(自然科學版)
하해대학학보(자연과학판)
JOURNAL OF HOHAI UNIVERSITY (NATURAL SCIENCES)
2013年
6期
531-535
,共5页
热带气旋%台风路径%最大风速%预报精度
熱帶氣鏇%檯風路徑%最大風速%預報精度
열대기선%태풍로경%최대풍속%예보정도
tropical typhoon%typhoon track%maximum wind velocity%forecast precision
为了科学地确定台风浪和风暴潮预报时采用的台风参数,利用中央气象台、日本气象厅、美国国家天气局、香港天文台和中国台湾气象局发布的预报资料,对各台站发布的2012年发生在西北太平洋上25个热带气旋的预报成果总体误差进行了分析和比较,并就2012年出现的两次双台风的预报误差进行了个例分析。结果表明:就整体而言,台风路径预报中,香港天文台的24 h,48 h和72 h预报次数最少但精度最高,分别为85.8 km,129.8 km,209.0 km;台风强度(最大风速)预报中,中央气象台在不同预报时效的平均绝对误差最小(4.5 m/s,6.0 m/s,6.6 m/s)且预报最稳定。而对于双台风的移动过程和强度变化,各台站的预报精度水平不一。
為瞭科學地確定檯風浪和風暴潮預報時採用的檯風參數,利用中央氣象檯、日本氣象廳、美國國傢天氣跼、香港天文檯和中國檯灣氣象跼髮佈的預報資料,對各檯站髮佈的2012年髮生在西北太平洋上25箇熱帶氣鏇的預報成果總體誤差進行瞭分析和比較,併就2012年齣現的兩次雙檯風的預報誤差進行瞭箇例分析。結果錶明:就整體而言,檯風路徑預報中,香港天文檯的24 h,48 h和72 h預報次數最少但精度最高,分彆為85.8 km,129.8 km,209.0 km;檯風彊度(最大風速)預報中,中央氣象檯在不同預報時效的平均絕對誤差最小(4.5 m/s,6.0 m/s,6.6 m/s)且預報最穩定。而對于雙檯風的移動過程和彊度變化,各檯站的預報精度水平不一。
위료과학지학정태풍랑화풍폭조예보시채용적태풍삼수,이용중앙기상태、일본기상청、미국국가천기국、향항천문태화중국태만기상국발포적예보자료,대각태참발포적2012년발생재서북태평양상25개열대기선적예보성과총체오차진행료분석화비교,병취2012년출현적량차쌍태풍적예보오차진행료개례분석。결과표명:취정체이언,태풍로경예보중,향항천문태적24 h,48 h화72 h예보차수최소단정도최고,분별위85.8 km,129.8 km,209.0 km;태풍강도(최대풍속)예보중,중앙기상태재불동예보시효적평균절대오차최소(4.5 m/s,6.0 m/s,6.6 m/s)차예보최은정。이대우쌍태풍적이동과정화강도변화,각태참적예보정도수평불일。
In order to scientifically determine the typhoon parameters when forecasting the storm surge and waves during tropical typhoon events, the overall wind forecasting errors of 25 tropical typhoon events that occurred over the northwest Pacific region in 2012 were analyzed and compared, based on typhoon forecasting data from the National Meteorological Center ( NMC) of China, the Japan Meteorological Agency ( JMA) , the National Weather Service ( NWS) of the United States, the Hong Kong Observatory ( HKO) of China, and the Taiwan Meteorological Center ( TMC) of China. Meanwhile, the forecasting errors of two twin typhoon events in 2012 were evaluated. The results show that the HKO had the highest precision in forecasting the typhoon track: the average errors for 24-hour, 48-hour, and 72-hour typhoon track forecasts were 85. 8 km, 129. 8 km, and 209. 0 km, respectively;and the NMC had the best performance in forecasting the maximum speed of the typhoon with the smallest mean absolute errors: the mean absolute errors of 24-hour, 48-hour, and 72-hour maximum speed forecasts were 4. 5 m/s, 6. 0 m/s, and 6. 6 m/s, respectively. The results also show that the level of forecasting errors varied at different stations in terms of the forecast of the moving process and intensity variation of twin typhoons.