中国医药导刊
中國醫藥導刊
중국의약도간
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GUIDE
2013年
11期
1753-1754
,共2页
诊室血压%动态血压监测%高血压
診室血壓%動態血壓鑑測%高血壓
진실혈압%동태혈압감측%고혈압
Clinic blood pressure%Ambulatory blood pressure%Hypertension
目的：通过对门诊可疑高血压患者进行动态血压(ABP)监测以及门诊诊室血压(CBP)的比较,了解高血压病可靠的监测方法。方法：门诊就诊者CBP(SBP≥120mmHg或DBP≥80mmHg)224例分为高血压组(154例)和血压正常高值组(70例),对2组的CBP水平及ABP监测结果进行分析。结果：高血压组和血压正常高值组ABP监测SBP、DBP具有显著性差异(P<0.01)。CBP和ABP监测全天血压平均值具有密切相关(P<0.01)。结论：24小时ABP监测对于高血压早期阶段具有较高的敏感度,CBP和ABP监测全天血压平均值具有密切相关性。
目的：通過對門診可疑高血壓患者進行動態血壓(ABP)鑑測以及門診診室血壓(CBP)的比較,瞭解高血壓病可靠的鑑測方法。方法：門診就診者CBP(SBP≥120mmHg或DBP≥80mmHg)224例分為高血壓組(154例)和血壓正常高值組(70例),對2組的CBP水平及ABP鑑測結果進行分析。結果：高血壓組和血壓正常高值組ABP鑑測SBP、DBP具有顯著性差異(P<0.01)。CBP和ABP鑑測全天血壓平均值具有密切相關(P<0.01)。結論：24小時ABP鑑測對于高血壓早期階段具有較高的敏感度,CBP和ABP鑑測全天血壓平均值具有密切相關性。
목적：통과대문진가의고혈압환자진행동태혈압(ABP)감측이급문진진실혈압(CBP)적비교,료해고혈압병가고적감측방법。방법：문진취진자CBP(SBP≥120mmHg혹DBP≥80mmHg)224례분위고혈압조(154례)화혈압정상고치조(70례),대2조적CBP수평급ABP감측결과진행분석。결과：고혈압조화혈압정상고치조ABP감측SBP、DBP구유현저성차이(P<0.01)。CBP화ABP감측전천혈압평균치구유밀절상관(P<0.01)。결론：24소시ABP감측대우고혈압조기계단구유교고적민감도,CBP화ABP감측전천혈압평균치구유밀절상관성。
Objective:To compare the ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) and clinic blood pressure (CBP) in clinically suspected hypertension subject, and to explore the reliable monitoring method of hypertension. Methods:Outpatients CBP (SBP≥120mmHg or DBP≥80mmHg) 224 were divided into hypertension group (154 cases) and high-normal blood pressure group (70 cases), the two groups of CBP and ABP monitoring results were analyzed. Results:Hypertension and high-normal blood pressure group ABP monitoring SBP, DBP has significant difference(P<0.01). CBP and ABP monitoring throughout the day mean blood pressure is closely related(P<0.01). Conclusions:ABP monitoring have higher sensitivity for early stage hypertension. The average blood pressure of ABP was significant associated with CBP.
