当代医学
噹代醫學
당대의학
CHINA CONTEMPORARY MEDICINE
2013年
32期
101-102
,共2页
郭有生%郭鹏%刘锦新%杨楚钦
郭有生%郭鵬%劉錦新%楊楚欽
곽유생%곽붕%류금신%양초흠
低位直肠癌根治术
低位直腸癌根治術
저위직장암근치술
Radical resection of low rectal cancer
目的:探讨低位直肠癌根治术不同术式的临床疗效,为临床提供参考。方法选择2002年6月-2006年6月行低位直肠癌根治术的216例患者资料进行回顾性分析,按术式不同分为三组,局部切除的102例患者为A组,TME+Dixon的62例患者为B组,TME+ Miles 52例患者为C组,观察患者并发症、复发率、5年生存率的差异。结果 A组患者5年生存率与复发率、并发症分别为(89.22%)、(37.25%)、(17.65%),B组分别为(61.29%)、(22.58%)、(6.45%),C组分别为(59.62%)、(23.08%)、(3.84%),A组5年生存率、复发率、并发症发生率显著高于B组及C组,差异有统计学意义(P﹤0.05),而B、C两组相比,差异无统计学意义(P﹥0.05)。结论对低位直肠癌,可根据病灶大小、病理学类型、Dukes分期等把握术式选择的适应症,保肛术式为首选,Miles 术为最后的选择。
目的:探討低位直腸癌根治術不同術式的臨床療效,為臨床提供參攷。方法選擇2002年6月-2006年6月行低位直腸癌根治術的216例患者資料進行迴顧性分析,按術式不同分為三組,跼部切除的102例患者為A組,TME+Dixon的62例患者為B組,TME+ Miles 52例患者為C組,觀察患者併髮癥、複髮率、5年生存率的差異。結果 A組患者5年生存率與複髮率、併髮癥分彆為(89.22%)、(37.25%)、(17.65%),B組分彆為(61.29%)、(22.58%)、(6.45%),C組分彆為(59.62%)、(23.08%)、(3.84%),A組5年生存率、複髮率、併髮癥髮生率顯著高于B組及C組,差異有統計學意義(P﹤0.05),而B、C兩組相比,差異無統計學意義(P﹥0.05)。結論對低位直腸癌,可根據病竈大小、病理學類型、Dukes分期等把握術式選擇的適應癥,保肛術式為首選,Miles 術為最後的選擇。
목적:탐토저위직장암근치술불동술식적림상료효,위림상제공삼고。방법선택2002년6월-2006년6월행저위직장암근치술적216례환자자료진행회고성분석,안술식불동분위삼조,국부절제적102례환자위A조,TME+Dixon적62례환자위B조,TME+ Miles 52례환자위C조,관찰환자병발증、복발솔、5년생존솔적차이。결과 A조환자5년생존솔여복발솔、병발증분별위(89.22%)、(37.25%)、(17.65%),B조분별위(61.29%)、(22.58%)、(6.45%),C조분별위(59.62%)、(23.08%)、(3.84%),A조5년생존솔、복발솔、병발증발생솔현저고우B조급C조,차이유통계학의의(P﹤0.05),이B、C량조상비,차이무통계학의의(P﹥0.05)。결론대저위직장암,가근거병조대소、병이학류형、Dukes분기등파악술식선택적괄응증,보항술식위수선,Miles 술위최후적선택。
Objective To discuss the effects of different operation mode in radical resection of low rectal cancer. Methods Clinical datas about 216 cases with low rectal cancer in June 2002 were analyzed retrospectively.216 caseswere divided into three groups according to different operation mode,102 patients with local excision were in group A,62 patients with TME+DIXON were in group B,52 patients with TME+MILES were in group C.The complications, recurrence rate, 5 year's survival rates were observed. Results The rate of 5-year survival,recurrence and complications of A groups were (89.22%)、(37.25%) and (17.65%),The B groups were (61.29%),(22.58%) and (6.45%).The C group were (59.62%),(23.08%), (3.84%),. The rate of 5-year survival,recurrence and complications of A groups were higher than that in group B and group C (P﹤0.05 ), while B, C groups, the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). Conclusion For low rectal cancer, we can choice the operation mode according to the size of the lesion , the histopathologic typesand Dukes stage g. Anus operation is the first selection, Miles for the final choice was.