医药前沿
醫藥前沿
의약전연
YIAYAO QIANYAN
2014年
5期
339-340
,共2页
谢海莲%卢美仪%陈春艳%叶英文%叶佳成
謝海蓮%盧美儀%陳春豔%葉英文%葉佳成
사해련%로미의%진춘염%협영문%협가성
无痛护理%膝关节术后疼痛%护理满意度评价%影响作用
無痛護理%膝關節術後疼痛%護理滿意度評價%影響作用
무통호리%슬관절술후동통%호리만의도평개%영향작용
painless nursing%pain of postoperative of knee-joint%nursing satisfaction evaluation%influence
目的：对无痛护理方法对膝关节患者术后疼痛的影响以及对护理满意度的影响进行分析和总结。方法随机选择2010年8月到2013年8月在我院骨科进行治疗的膝关节术后患者124例，将其平均分为对照组和观察组各62例，对照组给予常规的疼痛护理，观察组在常规疼痛的基础上增加无痛护理，对两组患者术后不同阶段的疼痛程度进行比较，并统计两组患者的护理满意度。结果观察组平均住院时间为（5.21±1.42）d，对照组平均住院时间为（7.23±1.35） d，两组比较P＜0.05，差异具有显著性；观察组的Lysholm评分平均值为（85.62±8.34）分，对照组的Lysholm评分平均值为（74.31±9.25）分，两组比较，P＜0.05，差异具有显著性；观察组的Lysholm评分优良率为88.71%，对照组的Lysholm评分优良率为37.10%，两组比较，P＜0.05，差异具有显著性；在护理满意度调查中，观察组的护理满意度为100%，对照组的护理满意度为67.74%，两组比较，P＜0.05，差异具有显著性。结论在膝关节患者术后疼痛护理中采用无痛护理能够有效的缩短患者住院时间，使患者的关节功能得到良好的恢复，并且还能提高患者的护理满意度评价，建议在膝关节术后临床护理中推广使用。
目的：對無痛護理方法對膝關節患者術後疼痛的影響以及對護理滿意度的影響進行分析和總結。方法隨機選擇2010年8月到2013年8月在我院骨科進行治療的膝關節術後患者124例，將其平均分為對照組和觀察組各62例，對照組給予常規的疼痛護理，觀察組在常規疼痛的基礎上增加無痛護理，對兩組患者術後不同階段的疼痛程度進行比較，併統計兩組患者的護理滿意度。結果觀察組平均住院時間為（5.21±1.42）d，對照組平均住院時間為（7.23±1.35） d，兩組比較P＜0.05，差異具有顯著性；觀察組的Lysholm評分平均值為（85.62±8.34）分，對照組的Lysholm評分平均值為（74.31±9.25）分，兩組比較，P＜0.05，差異具有顯著性；觀察組的Lysholm評分優良率為88.71%，對照組的Lysholm評分優良率為37.10%，兩組比較，P＜0.05，差異具有顯著性；在護理滿意度調查中，觀察組的護理滿意度為100%，對照組的護理滿意度為67.74%，兩組比較，P＜0.05，差異具有顯著性。結論在膝關節患者術後疼痛護理中採用無痛護理能夠有效的縮短患者住院時間，使患者的關節功能得到良好的恢複，併且還能提高患者的護理滿意度評價，建議在膝關節術後臨床護理中推廣使用。
목적：대무통호리방법대슬관절환자술후동통적영향이급대호리만의도적영향진행분석화총결。방법수궤선택2010년8월도2013년8월재아원골과진행치료적슬관절술후환자124례，장기평균분위대조조화관찰조각62례，대조조급여상규적동통호리，관찰조재상규동통적기출상증가무통호리，대량조환자술후불동계단적동통정도진행비교，병통계량조환자적호리만의도。결과관찰조평균주원시간위（5.21±1.42）d，대조조평균주원시간위（7.23±1.35） d，량조비교P＜0.05，차이구유현저성；관찰조적Lysholm평분평균치위（85.62±8.34）분，대조조적Lysholm평분평균치위（74.31±9.25）분，량조비교，P＜0.05，차이구유현저성；관찰조적Lysholm평분우량솔위88.71%，대조조적Lysholm평분우량솔위37.10%，량조비교，P＜0.05，차이구유현저성；재호리만의도조사중，관찰조적호리만의도위100%，대조조적호리만의도위67.74%，량조비교，P＜0.05，차이구유현저성。결론재슬관절환자술후동통호리중채용무통호리능구유효적축단환자주원시간，사환자적관절공능득도량호적회복，병차환능제고환자적호리만의도평개，건의재슬관절술후림상호리중추엄사용。
OBJECTIVE: To investigate and summarize the influence of painless nursing to postoperative pain of knee-joint patients and nursing satisfaction.METHOD: We first select 124 postoperative patients of knee-joint randomly in department of orthopaedics from august 2010 to august 2013. And divide it into control group and observation group, each group for 62 patients. For control group, we treat them with normal pain nursing. While for observation group, we treat them with painless nursing apart from normal pain nursing. At last, we compare the degree of pain in two group in different postoperative stage, and statistics their nursing satisfaction.RESULT: The mean time of postoperative hospital stay in observation group was (5.21±1.42) days, while the control group was (7.23±1.35) days. The difference was significant (P<0.05). The mean value of Lysholm grade in observation group was 85.62±8.34, while the control group was 74.31±9.25. The difference was significant (P<0.05). The good quality rate of Lysholm grade in observation group was 88.71%, while control group was 37.10%. For nursing satisfaction, the rate of observation group was 100%, while control group was 67.74%. The difference was significant (P<0.05).CONCLUSION:The painless nursing could significantly shorten time of postoperative hospital stay of knee-joint patients, renew their knee-joint function more better, and increase their nursing satisfaction evaluation. It is strongly recommended to use in the nursing of postoperative patients of knee-joint.
