实用皮肤病学杂志
實用皮膚病學雜誌
실용피부병학잡지
JOURNAL OF PRACTRCAL DERMATOLOGY
2014年
2期
126-128
,共3页
向芳%于世荣%丁媛
嚮芳%于世榮%丁媛
향방%우세영%정원
痤疮,瘢痕%铒激光%微剥脱%点阵模式
痤瘡,瘢痕%鉺激光%微剝脫%點陣模式
좌창,반흔%이격광%미박탈%점진모식
Acne,scar%Erbium laser%Micro-stripping%Fractional mode
目的:评价点阵铒激光治疗面部痤疮瘢痕的临床疗效。方法使用波长2940 nm铒激光治疗仪,采用微剥脱模式(A组)、点阵模式(B组)及两种方法联合(C组)治疗痤疮瘢痕,治疗前后使用ECCA 权重评分表进行评分,比较3种治疗方案的疗效差异。结果3种方法治疗前后ECCA差值比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。A组与B组2种治疗方法比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),C组与A组、C组与B组2种治疗方法比较,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。结论铒激光治疗痤疮瘢痕疗效确切,且微剥脱模式及联合点阵模式治疗效果更显著。
目的:評價點陣鉺激光治療麵部痤瘡瘢痕的臨床療效。方法使用波長2940 nm鉺激光治療儀,採用微剝脫模式(A組)、點陣模式(B組)及兩種方法聯閤(C組)治療痤瘡瘢痕,治療前後使用ECCA 權重評分錶進行評分,比較3種治療方案的療效差異。結果3種方法治療前後ECCA差值比較,差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05)。A組與B組2種治療方法比較,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05),C組與A組、C組與B組2種治療方法比較,差異有統計學意義(P均<0.05)。結論鉺激光治療痤瘡瘢痕療效確切,且微剝脫模式及聯閤點陣模式治療效果更顯著。
목적:평개점진이격광치료면부좌창반흔적림상료효。방법사용파장2940 nm이격광치료의,채용미박탈모식(A조)、점진모식(B조)급량충방법연합(C조)치료좌창반흔,치료전후사용ECCA 권중평분표진행평분,비교3충치료방안적료효차이。결과3충방법치료전후ECCA차치비교,차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05)。A조여B조2충치료방법비교,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05),C조여A조、C조여B조2충치료방법비교,차이유통계학의의(P균<0.05)。결론이격광치료좌창반흔료효학절,차미박탈모식급연합점진모식치료효과경현저。
Objective To evaluate the role of erbium laser on the treatment of acne scar. Methods To treat acne scar by 2940 nm erbium laser with micro-stripping mode(group A), fractional mode(group B) and combined treatment(group C). Before and after treatment, ECCA grading scale was assessed and compared. Results Comparison of three methods of ECCA, three methods of treatment were signiifcant (P<0.05). Group A and B had no difference in the acne scar patients (P>0.05). However, group C is more effective than group A and B (P<0.05). Conclusion Erbium laser is an efifcient method in the treatment of acne scar, especially the comibination therapy with micro-stripping mode and fractional mode.