CAJ | 학술논문

目的探讨传统静脉输液拔针法与改良静脉输液拔针法的效果。方法将100例行静脉输液患者分为对照组50例（输液255例次）和改良组50例（输液255例次），对照组采用传统拔针法，改良组采用改良拔针法。比较两组患者拔针后并发症发生情况。结果改良组患者疼痛和皮下瘀血或穿刺点出血发生率较对照组低，两组比较，P ＜0?001，差异具有统计学意义。结论改良式静脉拔针法可降低静脉输液拔针后并发症的发生率，提高静脉输液安全性，值得临床推广应用。
목적탐토전통정맥수액발침법여개량정맥수액발침법적효과。방법장100례행정맥수액환자분위대조조50례（수액255례차）화개량조50례（수액255례차），대조조채용전통발침법，개량조채용개량발침법。비교량조환자발침후병발증발생정황。결과개량조환자동통화피하어혈혹천자점출혈발생솔교대조조저，량조비교，P ＜0?001，차이구유통계학의의。결론개량식정맥발침법가강저정맥수액발침후병발증적발생솔，제고정맥수액안전성，치득림상추엄응용。
Objective To investigate the effects of the routine needle-withdrawing method and improved needle-withdrawing method? Methods One hundred patients undergoing intravenous transfusion were randomized into the control group and the improvement group (255 times of transfusion ), with 50 cases in each group: the former was treated with routine needle-withdrawing method and the latter with the improved method? Complications after needle-withdruing were compared between the two groups? Result The rates of pains, subcutaneous bleeding or bleeding at the puncture points in the improvement group were all significantly lower than those of the control group (P<0?001)? Conclusion The improved needle-withdrawing method is effective in reducing the rate of post-withdrawal complications and improve the safety of intravenous transfusion?