电网技术
電網技術
전망기술
POWER SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY
2013年
5期
1414-1419
,共6页
郭卫%李晓萍%习山%邢鹏翔%姜志鹏%王羽%谭波
郭衛%李曉萍%習山%邢鵬翔%薑誌鵬%王羽%譚波
곽위%리효평%습산%형붕상%강지붕%왕우%담파
直接边界元法%间接边界元法%块状土壤%接地参数%剖分单元
直接邊界元法%間接邊界元法%塊狀土壤%接地參數%剖分單元
직접변계원법%간접변계원법%괴상토양%접지삼수%부분단원
direct boundary element method%indirect boundary element methods%soil with massive texture%grounding parameters%subdivision unit
目前通常用直接边界元法和间接边界元法对块状土壤接地问题进行研究,但对这2种方法进行对比研究却鲜见报道。对地网处在块状土壤区域中的接地模型分别用直接边界元法和间接边界元法法进行原理推导,通过与接地软件CDEGS的计算结果进行对比表明2种方法及编程原理的正确性;计算结果表明在相同边界剖分方式下,直接边界元法在求解该块状土壤接地模型时需要的剖分单元数量比间接边界元法需要的剖分单元数量更少,而且随着块状土壤厚度的减小,直接边界元法在剖分数量上的优势更加明显且计算结果更加稳定。最后运用直接边界元法对较为复杂的块状土壤接地模型进行计算,计算结果对实际接地工程应用提供了参考。
目前通常用直接邊界元法和間接邊界元法對塊狀土壤接地問題進行研究,但對這2種方法進行對比研究卻鮮見報道。對地網處在塊狀土壤區域中的接地模型分彆用直接邊界元法和間接邊界元法法進行原理推導,通過與接地軟件CDEGS的計算結果進行對比錶明2種方法及編程原理的正確性;計算結果錶明在相同邊界剖分方式下,直接邊界元法在求解該塊狀土壤接地模型時需要的剖分單元數量比間接邊界元法需要的剖分單元數量更少,而且隨著塊狀土壤厚度的減小,直接邊界元法在剖分數量上的優勢更加明顯且計算結果更加穩定。最後運用直接邊界元法對較為複雜的塊狀土壤接地模型進行計算,計算結果對實際接地工程應用提供瞭參攷。
목전통상용직접변계원법화간접변계원법대괴상토양접지문제진행연구,단대저2충방법진행대비연구각선견보도。대지망처재괴상토양구역중적접지모형분별용직접변계원법화간접변계원법법진행원리추도,통과여접지연건CDEGS적계산결과진행대비표명2충방법급편정원리적정학성;계산결과표명재상동변계부분방식하,직접변계원법재구해해괴상토양접지모형시수요적부분단원수량비간접변계원법수요적부분단원수량경소,이차수착괴상토양후도적감소,직접변계원법재부분수량상적우세경가명현차계산결과경가은정。최후운용직접변계원법대교위복잡적괴상토양접지모형진행계산,계산결과대실제접지공정응용제공료삼고。
At present the direct boundary element method and indirect boundary element method are usually applied to the research on grounding grid in the soil with massive texture, however the comparative study on the application of the two methods is rarely reported. Based on direct boundary element method and indirect boundary element method, theoretical models of grounding grid in the soil with massive texture are deduced respectively, and the results of comparing the deduced models with the computing result by ground software CDEGS show that the two methods and the programming principles applied to them are correct. Computing results show during the solution of grounding model in the soil with massive texture under the same boundary dividing way the amount of subdivision units needed by direct boundary element method is less than that needed by indirect boundary element method, and with the decrease of the thickness of the soil with massive texture, the superiority of direct boundary element method in the needed amount of subdivision units behaves more evidently and the computing results are more stable. Finally, the direct boundary element method is applied in the calculation of more complex ground model in the soil with massive texture, and the calculation results are available for reference to actual grounding engineering project.