中国医药指南
中國醫藥指南
중국의약지남
CHINA MEDICINE GUIDE
2013年
14期
489-491
,共3页
梁育华%何季珊%何剑红%谢雷%林家洪
樑育華%何季珊%何劍紅%謝雷%林傢洪
량육화%하계산%하검홍%사뢰%림가홍
乳腺癌%早期诊断%钼靶%超声%MRI
乳腺癌%早期診斷%鉬靶%超聲%MRI
유선암%조기진단%목파%초성%MRI
Breast cancer%Early diagnosis%Mammography%Ultrasound%MRI
目的对乳腺癌的影像学特征进行观察与分析,为今后的临床治疗工作提供可靠的参考依据。方法抽取在2010年1月至2012年12月间我院与肇庆市第二人民医院收治的可疑早期乳腺癌临床患者病例90例,对其在术前分别展开钼靶、超声、钼靶与超声联合以及MRI 检查,并将上述四种检查方法的检查结果同病理结果进行比较,而后对比分析各种检查方法的准确性、特异性、敏感性、阴性预测值、阳性预测值、假阳性率以及假阴性率。结果经统计,钼靶与超声联合检查和 MRI 检查结果的准确性、特异性、敏感性、阴性预测值、阳性预测值均较钼靶、超声单独应用明显提高(P <0.05),且假阳性率和假阴性率均得到了显著降低(P <0.05);而钼靶超声联合检查结果与 MRI 检查结果差异无显著统计学意义(P >0.05)。结论对于乳腺癌早期临床诊断而言,钼靶与超声联合的检查方法和 MRI 检查能够使诊断的准确性得到显著提高,为临床治疗方案的选择提供可靠的参考依据,值得推广应用。
目的對乳腺癌的影像學特徵進行觀察與分析,為今後的臨床治療工作提供可靠的參攷依據。方法抽取在2010年1月至2012年12月間我院與肇慶市第二人民醫院收治的可疑早期乳腺癌臨床患者病例90例,對其在術前分彆展開鉬靶、超聲、鉬靶與超聲聯閤以及MRI 檢查,併將上述四種檢查方法的檢查結果同病理結果進行比較,而後對比分析各種檢查方法的準確性、特異性、敏感性、陰性預測值、暘性預測值、假暘性率以及假陰性率。結果經統計,鉬靶與超聲聯閤檢查和 MRI 檢查結果的準確性、特異性、敏感性、陰性預測值、暘性預測值均較鉬靶、超聲單獨應用明顯提高(P <0.05),且假暘性率和假陰性率均得到瞭顯著降低(P <0.05);而鉬靶超聲聯閤檢查結果與 MRI 檢查結果差異無顯著統計學意義(P >0.05)。結論對于乳腺癌早期臨床診斷而言,鉬靶與超聲聯閤的檢查方法和 MRI 檢查能夠使診斷的準確性得到顯著提高,為臨床治療方案的選擇提供可靠的參攷依據,值得推廣應用。
목적대유선암적영상학특정진행관찰여분석,위금후적림상치료공작제공가고적삼고의거。방법추취재2010년1월지2012년12월간아원여조경시제이인민의원수치적가의조기유선암림상환자병례90례,대기재술전분별전개목파、초성、목파여초성연합이급MRI 검사,병장상술사충검사방법적검사결과동병리결과진행비교,이후대비분석각충검사방법적준학성、특이성、민감성、음성예측치、양성예측치、가양성솔이급가음성솔。결과경통계,목파여초성연합검사화 MRI 검사결과적준학성、특이성、민감성、음성예측치、양성예측치균교목파、초성단독응용명현제고(P <0.05),차가양성솔화가음성솔균득도료현저강저(P <0.05);이목파초성연합검사결과여 MRI 검사결과차이무현저통계학의의(P >0.05)。결론대우유선암조기림상진단이언,목파여초성연합적검사방법화 MRI 검사능구사진단적준학성득도현저제고,위림상치료방안적선택제공가고적삼고의거,치득추엄응용。
Objective To breast cancer imaging features were observed and analyzed, and provide a reliable basis for clinical treatment in future. Methods In the second people's hospital from 2010 January to 2012 December in our hospital and Zhaoqing city suspicious early breast cancer patients with clinical cases in 90 cases, the respectively, ultrasound, molybdenum target mammography combined with ultrasonic and MRI examination before operation, and the four methods of inspection findings and pathological results were comparison and contrast analysis, the accuracy of different examination methods, the specificity, sensitivity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, false positive rate and false negative rate. Results The statistical results, mammography and ultrasound examination and MRI examination results of accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value than mammography, ultrasound alone significantly increased (P<0.05), and the false positive rate and false negative rate were significantly decreased (P<0.05); and the difference of molybdenum targeted ultrasound examination results and the results of MRI were not statistically significant (P>0.05). Conclusion In breast cancer early diagnosis, mammography and ultrasound examination and MRI examination can make the diagnosis accuracy is greatly improved, provide a reliable basis for the clinical treatment options, it is worthy of popularization and application.