CAJ | 학술논문

随着人工生殖技术的发展，体外受精越来越多，而这与传统的体内受精生殖方式有非常大的差别。同时，胚胎干细胞生物技术的发展也为多种不治之症带来了福音。这就涉及到了一个根本性的问题，即体外胚胎的法律地位究竟如何？这一问题与胚胎归属、继承权、侵权损害赔偿请求权以及能否被应用于科学研究息息相关，不明确胚胎的法律地位，这些问题都不能得到很好的解答。关于胚胎的法律地位，在理论上主要存在三种学说，即主体说、客体说和中间说。通过分析国外立法及比较各种学说，以胚胎为中间体的基础上，可以就我国未来关于胚胎立法的制度构建提出具体建议。
수착인공생식기술적발전，체외수정월래월다，이저여전통적체내수정생식방식유비상대적차별。동시，배태간세포생물기술적발전야위다충불치지증대래료복음。저취섭급도료일개근본성적문제，즉체외배태적법률지위구경여하？저일문제여배태귀속、계승권、침권손해배상청구권이급능부피응용우과학연구식식상관，불명학배태적법률지위，저사문제도불능득도흔호적해답。관우배태적법률지위，재이론상주요존재삼충학설，즉주체설、객체설화중간설。통과분석국외입법급비교각충학설，이배태위중간체적기출상，가이취아국미래관우배태입법적제도구건제출구체건의。
With the development of artificial reproductive technology, there have been more and more cases of in vitro fertilization, which differs much from the traditional mode of reproduction. Meanwhile, the development of embryonic stem cell biotechnology has also brought gospel for many incurable diseases. However, this phenomenon concerns a fundamental question that what the embryonic legal status is. This question is closely related to the embryonic ownership, inheritance rights, tort damages claim as well as to the question that whether the embryo can be used in scientiifc research. We must clarify what the embryonic legal status is. Theoretically, there are three main doctrines, namely, subject, object and intermediate. By analyzing and comparing various theories of foreign legislation, there are some specific recommendations for the future legislation on embryo in China on the basis of the doctrine of intermediate.