CAJ | 학술논문

当前我国社会具有转型社会和风险社会的双重特征，公民权利意识和风险意识与日俱增，但外部性调节机制作用有限，社会信任不足，“决定-宣布-辩护”决策模式无法适应新形势下的需求，工程项目的社会风险问题凸显。总结应对邻避问题的国际经验，保障和规范公众的知情权和参与权，建立重大工程项目的社会风险评估报告制度，鼓励独立风险评估机构的发展，完善重大工程项目的风险补偿机制，对于完善我国工程项目社会风险治理机制至关重要。
당전아국사회구유전형사회화풍험사회적쌍중특정，공민권리의식화풍험의식여일구증，단외부성조절궤제작용유한，사회신임불족，“결정-선포-변호”결책모식무법괄응신형세하적수구，공정항목적사회풍험문제철현。총결응대린피문제적국제경험，보장화규범공음적지정권화삼여권，건립중대공정항목적사회풍험평고보고제도，고려독립풍험평고궤구적발전，완선중대공정항목적풍험보상궤제，대우완선아국공정항목사회풍험치리궤제지관중요。
In recent years, more and more collective protests were triggered by the planning and construction of major projects, and the so-cial risk of projects is becoming an issue which cannot be ignored. This paper argues that China is now facing challenges from the rapid mod-ernization and systematic transformation, which makes itself a risk society. With the awaken consciousness of civil rights, the enhanced awareness of risk, the lack of social trust, and the weak mechanism of interest expression and benefits distribution, the traditional deci-sion-announce-defense model of major projects cannot cope with the challenges posed by not in my back yard (NIMBY) protests. In order to get references for the governance of NIMBY, this paper summarizes the international experiences, with a special focus on three issues, name-ly, the category of public demands, the response measures, and the institutional system. Finally, policy recommendations were given for the governance of NIMBY syndrome in China as follows:ensuring the public's right to know and participate, establishing the report system of so-cial risk assessment, developing independent risk assessment agencies, and improving the mechanism of risk compensation.