中国现代医生
中國現代醫生
중국현대의생
CHINA MODERN DOCTOR
2014年
18期
8-10,13
,共4页
夏炎火%郑小蕾%王丹%余方友%林锡芳%潘景业
夏炎火%鄭小蕾%王丹%餘方友%林錫芳%潘景業
하염화%정소뢰%왕단%여방우%림석방%반경업
血浆肾素活性%血管紧张素Ⅱ%ALI/ARDS%诊断%预后
血漿腎素活性%血管緊張素Ⅱ%ALI/ARDS%診斷%預後
혈장신소활성%혈관긴장소Ⅱ%ALI/ARDS%진단%예후
Plasma renin activity%Angiotensin Ⅱ%ALI/ARDS%Diagnosis%Prognosis
目的:探讨PRA、AngⅡ在ALI/ARDS患者中的变化和意义。方法测定ALI/ARDS和非ALI/ARDS患者血浆PRA和AngⅡ浓度,进行APACHEⅡ评分和LIS评分,计算病死率,进一步将患者按预后分组,进行比较和相关分析,利用ROC曲线评价PRA和AngⅡ的诊断分辨度。结果与非ALI/ARDS组相比,ALI/ARDS组血浆PRA和AngⅡ浓度明显增高(P<0.05),死亡组血浆PRA和AngⅡ浓度高于存活组(P <0.05)。 PRA、AngⅡ与APACHEⅡ评分、LIS、乳酸(LAC)间均呈明显正相关。 PRA在预测ALI/ARDS方面有显著意义(AUC=0.705,P=0.001),AngⅡ对预测ALI/ARDS也有显著意义(AUC=0.672, P=0.007)。在预测ALI/ARDS方面,PRA、AngⅡ与LIS相比无明显差异(P=0.923,P=0.713)。结论 ALI/ARDS患者血浆PRA和AngⅡ水平明显升高,两者在预测ALI/ARDS和判断其预后方面均有重要意义,而AngⅡ在预测ALI/ARDS中的特异度较高。
目的:探討PRA、AngⅡ在ALI/ARDS患者中的變化和意義。方法測定ALI/ARDS和非ALI/ARDS患者血漿PRA和AngⅡ濃度,進行APACHEⅡ評分和LIS評分,計算病死率,進一步將患者按預後分組,進行比較和相關分析,利用ROC麯線評價PRA和AngⅡ的診斷分辨度。結果與非ALI/ARDS組相比,ALI/ARDS組血漿PRA和AngⅡ濃度明顯增高(P<0.05),死亡組血漿PRA和AngⅡ濃度高于存活組(P <0.05)。 PRA、AngⅡ與APACHEⅡ評分、LIS、乳痠(LAC)間均呈明顯正相關。 PRA在預測ALI/ARDS方麵有顯著意義(AUC=0.705,P=0.001),AngⅡ對預測ALI/ARDS也有顯著意義(AUC=0.672, P=0.007)。在預測ALI/ARDS方麵,PRA、AngⅡ與LIS相比無明顯差異(P=0.923,P=0.713)。結論 ALI/ARDS患者血漿PRA和AngⅡ水平明顯升高,兩者在預測ALI/ARDS和判斷其預後方麵均有重要意義,而AngⅡ在預測ALI/ARDS中的特異度較高。
목적:탐토PRA、AngⅡ재ALI/ARDS환자중적변화화의의。방법측정ALI/ARDS화비ALI/ARDS환자혈장PRA화AngⅡ농도,진행APACHEⅡ평분화LIS평분,계산병사솔,진일보장환자안예후분조,진행비교화상관분석,이용ROC곡선평개PRA화AngⅡ적진단분변도。결과여비ALI/ARDS조상비,ALI/ARDS조혈장PRA화AngⅡ농도명현증고(P<0.05),사망조혈장PRA화AngⅡ농도고우존활조(P <0.05)。 PRA、AngⅡ여APACHEⅡ평분、LIS、유산(LAC)간균정명현정상관。 PRA재예측ALI/ARDS방면유현저의의(AUC=0.705,P=0.001),AngⅡ대예측ALI/ARDS야유현저의의(AUC=0.672, P=0.007)。재예측ALI/ARDS방면,PRA、AngⅡ여LIS상비무명현차이(P=0.923,P=0.713)。결론 ALI/ARDS환자혈장PRA화AngⅡ수평명현승고,량자재예측ALI/ARDS화판단기예후방면균유중요의의,이AngⅡ재예측ALI/ARDS중적특이도교고。
Objective To investigate the clinical significance and levels of plasma renin activity (PRA), Angiotensin (Ang) Ⅱ in ALI / ARDS patients. Methods The levels of PRA and AngⅡ, APACHE Ⅱ score, lung injury score(LIS), and mortality were analyzed in ALI/ARDS patients and non-ALI/ARDS group. After the patients were grouped accord-ing to prognosis, correlation analysis and ROC curve to evaluate diagnostic efficacy of PRA and AngⅡ were performed. Results Compared with non- ALI/ARDS group, the levels of PRA and AngⅡ were significantly increased in ALI/ARDS (P<0.05). In the death group, the levels of PRA and AngⅡwere higher than that of the survival group (P<0.05). It was significant positive correlation between APACHEⅡ score,LIS,lactic acid (LAC) and PRA, so as AngⅡ. In pre-dicting ALI/ARDS, PRA was significant (AUC=0.705, P=0.001), so as AngⅡ(AUC=0.672, P =0.007). In predict-ing ALI/ARDS, there was no significant difference between PRA and LIS (P=0.923), and also between AngⅡ and LIS (P = 0.713). Conclusion In ALI/ARDS patients, the levels of PRA and AngⅡwere significantly increased, and both could be used to predict ALI/ARDS and determine its prognosis, but AngⅡhad higher specificity in predicting ALI/ARDS.