南通大学学报(社会科学版)
南通大學學報(社會科學版)
남통대학학보(사회과학판)
JOURNAL OF NANTONG UNIVERSITY (SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION)
2013年
4期
71-76
,共6页
蔡元培%张謇%体育思想%异同
蔡元培%張謇%體育思想%異同
채원배%장건%체육사상%이동
Cai Yuan-pei%Zhang Jian%ideas on PE%similarities and differences
蔡元培与张謇同为中国近代著名教育家,他们俩人对于二十世纪上半叶中国体育教育的发展,都曾提出过具有前瞻性和创见性的思想观点。在论及德、智、体三者的关系上,蔡元培和张謇均主张三育并重,并认为体育是培养“完全之人格”不可或缺的重要教育方式;在运动竞赛方面,他们俩人均认为体育赛会能够养成社会公德,并都反对选手体育;在女子体育方面,他们俩均认为女子应与男子同样享有教育权、体育权,女子体育运动的开展可以推进妇女解放运动的进程。但在体育的推展方式上,他们的思想又各具特色,蔡元培注重于终生体育的培养,张謇则注重于大众体育的普及。
蔡元培與張謇同為中國近代著名教育傢,他們倆人對于二十世紀上半葉中國體育教育的髮展,都曾提齣過具有前瞻性和創見性的思想觀點。在論及德、智、體三者的關繫上,蔡元培和張謇均主張三育併重,併認為體育是培養“完全之人格”不可或缺的重要教育方式;在運動競賽方麵,他們倆人均認為體育賽會能夠養成社會公德,併都反對選手體育;在女子體育方麵,他們倆均認為女子應與男子同樣享有教育權、體育權,女子體育運動的開展可以推進婦女解放運動的進程。但在體育的推展方式上,他們的思想又各具特色,蔡元培註重于終生體育的培養,張謇則註重于大衆體育的普及。
채원배여장건동위중국근대저명교육가,타문량인대우이십세기상반협중국체육교육적발전,도증제출과구유전첨성화창견성적사상관점。재론급덕、지、체삼자적관계상,채원배화장건균주장삼육병중,병인위체육시배양“완전지인격”불가혹결적중요교육방식;재운동경새방면,타문량인균인위체육새회능구양성사회공덕,병도반대선수체육;재녀자체육방면,타문량균인위녀자응여남자동양향유교육권、체육권,녀자체육운동적개전가이추진부녀해방운동적진정。단재체육적추전방식상,타문적사상우각구특색,채원배주중우종생체육적배양,장건칙주중우대음체육적보급。
As famous educators in modern China, both Cai Yuan-pei and Zhang Jian have put forward creative foresights for the development of PE in the early 20th century. When it comes to the relationships among morality, intelligence and physical fitness, both Cai Yuan-pei and Zhang Jian hold that equal emphasis should be laid on these three elements, and believe that PE is an indispensible method for the cultivation of “full personality”. They also maintain that sports matches can cultivate social morals, and object to professional players in PE. Meanwhile, they think that women should enjoy equality in education and PE, and the sports activities by women can advocate women liberation movement. However, their ideas exhibit differences in the pro-moting ways of PE, with Cai’s emphasis on lifelong PE while Zhang on mass PE.