临床和实验医学杂志
臨床和實驗醫學雜誌
림상화실험의학잡지
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
2014年
9期
771-774
,共4页
王凯%徐定华%石秋萍%王超%王红%张淑文
王凱%徐定華%石鞦萍%王超%王紅%張淑文
왕개%서정화%석추평%왕초%왕홍%장숙문
不明原因发热%普通发热待查%病因%住院时间%住院花费%回顾性研究
不明原因髮熱%普通髮熱待查%病因%住院時間%住院花費%迴顧性研究
불명원인발열%보통발열대사%병인%주원시간%주원화비%회고성연구
Fever of unknown origin%Ordinary fever%Pathogenic causes%Duration of hospitalization%Hospitalization cost%Retrospective analysis
目的:回顾性比较不明原因发热(FUO)与普通发热待查病人病因分布、住院时间、住院花费。方法回顾性比较不明原因发热病人372例和普通发热待查的病人780例。结果 FUO 组372例中确诊率为90.3%,病因构成为感染病226例(60.8%),结核病75例(33.2%),风湿免疫病48例(12.9%),肿瘤31例(8.3%),其它33例(8.9%);出院时仍未确诊的36例(9.7%)。普通发热待查组780例中确诊率为98.8%,病因构成为感染病717例(91.9%),风湿免疫病15例(1.9%),肿瘤9例(1.2%);出院时仍未确诊的9例(1.2%)。两组病因构成差异有统计学意义(χ2=178.23,P =0.000)。FUO 组住院天数(15±12天)长于普通发热待查组(12±9天)( Z =-5.739,P <0.05)。FUO组住院花费(13813.84±14720.62元)显著高于普通发热待查组(7014.20±7517.11元)( Z =-7.971,P <0.05)。结论感染性疾病是 FUO 与普通发热待查的主要病因,普通发热待查组感染性疾病所占比率更高,FUO 组中风湿免疫病及肿瘤占有相当大的比率。FUO 组的住院时间更长、住院花费更大。
目的:迴顧性比較不明原因髮熱(FUO)與普通髮熱待查病人病因分佈、住院時間、住院花費。方法迴顧性比較不明原因髮熱病人372例和普通髮熱待查的病人780例。結果 FUO 組372例中確診率為90.3%,病因構成為感染病226例(60.8%),結覈病75例(33.2%),風濕免疫病48例(12.9%),腫瘤31例(8.3%),其它33例(8.9%);齣院時仍未確診的36例(9.7%)。普通髮熱待查組780例中確診率為98.8%,病因構成為感染病717例(91.9%),風濕免疫病15例(1.9%),腫瘤9例(1.2%);齣院時仍未確診的9例(1.2%)。兩組病因構成差異有統計學意義(χ2=178.23,P =0.000)。FUO 組住院天數(15±12天)長于普通髮熱待查組(12±9天)( Z =-5.739,P <0.05)。FUO組住院花費(13813.84±14720.62元)顯著高于普通髮熱待查組(7014.20±7517.11元)( Z =-7.971,P <0.05)。結論感染性疾病是 FUO 與普通髮熱待查的主要病因,普通髮熱待查組感染性疾病所佔比率更高,FUO 組中風濕免疫病及腫瘤佔有相噹大的比率。FUO 組的住院時間更長、住院花費更大。
목적:회고성비교불명원인발열(FUO)여보통발열대사병인병인분포、주원시간、주원화비。방법회고성비교불명원인발열병인372례화보통발열대사적병인780례。결과 FUO 조372례중학진솔위90.3%,병인구성위감염병226례(60.8%),결핵병75례(33.2%),풍습면역병48례(12.9%),종류31례(8.3%),기타33례(8.9%);출원시잉미학진적36례(9.7%)。보통발열대사조780례중학진솔위98.8%,병인구성위감염병717례(91.9%),풍습면역병15례(1.9%),종류9례(1.2%);출원시잉미학진적9례(1.2%)。량조병인구성차이유통계학의의(χ2=178.23,P =0.000)。FUO 조주원천수(15±12천)장우보통발열대사조(12±9천)( Z =-5.739,P <0.05)。FUO조주원화비(13813.84±14720.62원)현저고우보통발열대사조(7014.20±7517.11원)( Z =-7.971,P <0.05)。결론감염성질병시 FUO 여보통발열대사적주요병인,보통발열대사조감염성질병소점비솔경고,FUO 조중풍습면역병급종류점유상당대적비솔。FUO 조적주원시간경장、주원화비경대。
Objective To explore the difference in distribution of pathogenic causes,duration of hospitalization and cost for hospitalization between patients with fever of unknown origin and common febrile diseases. Methods The clinical data of 372 patients with FUO were retrospec-tively compared with the clinical data of 780 patients with common fever. Results The diagnostic rate of 372 cases in FUO group was 90. 3% ,the etiologic causes of 226 cases were infection(60. 8% )including 75 cases of tuberculosis(33. 2% ),48 cases of rheumatism(12. 9% ),31 cases of tumor(8. 3% ),33 cases with other causes(8. 9% ),and there were 36 cases(9. 7% )still unknown at discharge from the hospital. In ordi-nary fever group of 780 cases,the diagnostic rate was 98. 8% ,the etiologic causes of 717 cases were infection(91. 9% ),rheumatism in 15 cases (1. 9% ),tumor in 9 cases(1. 2% ),and there were 9 cases(1. 2% )still unknown at discharge from the hospital. There was significant differ-ence(χ2 = 178. 23,P = 0. 000)in etiology between these 2 groups. In group FUO,days of hospitalization(15 ± 12 days)were longer than those of common fever group(12 ± 9 d)( Z = - 5. 739,P < 0. 05). The average cost of FUO group was 13 813. 84 ± 14 720. 62 yuans,and it was significantly higher than that of ordinary fever group(7 014. 20 ± 7517. 11 yuans)(Z = - 7. 971,P < 0. 05). Conclusion Infectious diseases are the major causes of FUO and ordinary fever group,and the incidence rate of infection in ordinary group is higher than that of FUO group. Rheumatism and tumor have quite large proportion in FUO group. Patients in FUO group have longer duration of hospitalization and more cost than those of patients in common febrile group.