临床和实验医学杂志
臨床和實驗醫學雜誌
림상화실험의학잡지
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
2014年
9期
769-771
,共3页
白细胞检验%尿液干化学法%尿沉渣镜检法%联合检测%临床价值
白細胞檢驗%尿液榦化學法%尿沉渣鏡檢法%聯閤檢測%臨床價值
백세포검험%뇨액간화학법%뇨침사경검법%연합검측%림상개치
White blood cell test%Urine dry chemistry method%Microscopic examination of urinary sediment%Combined detection%Clin-ical value
目的：探讨联合应用尿液干化学法与尿沉渣镜检法进行白细胞检验的临床价值。方法选取接受治疗并需要做尿检的患者1100例，将其平均分为实验组和对照组两组，每组均为550例患者。对照组用单纯的尿液干化学法进行尿液白细胞检测；实验组在尿液干化学法检验的基础上，联合应用尿沉渣镜检法进行尿液白细胞检测。对比两组检验结果，分析两组检验结果的错误率与尿液白细胞检验结果。结果实验组的尿液白细胞检验的总错误率（0.18％）明显低于对照组（2.54％），差异有显著性（ P <0.05）。实验组患者尿液白细胞检验的阳性率（60.91％）和对照组（57.64％）无显著差异（ P ﹥0.05）。结论联合应用尿液干化学法与尿沉渣镜检法进行白细胞检验时，检验结果的准确性高，总错误率小，明显比单纯应用尿液干化学法检验的效果好，降低了误诊率和漏诊率，准确可靠，值得在临床上广泛应用。
目的：探討聯閤應用尿液榦化學法與尿沉渣鏡檢法進行白細胞檢驗的臨床價值。方法選取接受治療併需要做尿檢的患者1100例，將其平均分為實驗組和對照組兩組，每組均為550例患者。對照組用單純的尿液榦化學法進行尿液白細胞檢測；實驗組在尿液榦化學法檢驗的基礎上，聯閤應用尿沉渣鏡檢法進行尿液白細胞檢測。對比兩組檢驗結果，分析兩組檢驗結果的錯誤率與尿液白細胞檢驗結果。結果實驗組的尿液白細胞檢驗的總錯誤率（0.18％）明顯低于對照組（2.54％），差異有顯著性（ P <0.05）。實驗組患者尿液白細胞檢驗的暘性率（60.91％）和對照組（57.64％）無顯著差異（ P ﹥0.05）。結論聯閤應用尿液榦化學法與尿沉渣鏡檢法進行白細胞檢驗時，檢驗結果的準確性高，總錯誤率小，明顯比單純應用尿液榦化學法檢驗的效果好，降低瞭誤診率和漏診率，準確可靠，值得在臨床上廣汎應用。
목적：탐토연합응용뇨액간화학법여뇨침사경검법진행백세포검험적림상개치。방법선취접수치료병수요주뇨검적환자1100례，장기평균분위실험조화대조조량조，매조균위550례환자。대조조용단순적뇨액간화학법진행뇨액백세포검측；실험조재뇨액간화학법검험적기출상，연합응용뇨침사경검법진행뇨액백세포검측。대비량조검험결과，분석량조검험결과적착오솔여뇨액백세포검험결과。결과실험조적뇨액백세포검험적총착오솔（0.18％）명현저우대조조（2.54％），차이유현저성（ P <0.05）。실험조환자뇨액백세포검험적양성솔（60.91％）화대조조（57.64％）무현저차이（ P ﹥0.05）。결론연합응용뇨액간화학법여뇨침사경검법진행백세포검험시，검험결과적준학성고，총착오솔소，명현비단순응용뇨액간화학법검험적효과호，강저료오진솔화루진솔，준학가고，치득재림상상엄범응용。
Objective To explore the clinical value of combined use of urine dry chemistry method and urinary sediment microsco-py in white blood cell( WBC)examination. Methods 1 100 patients who received urine test were divided into experimental group( n =550)and control group( n = 550). Control group was examined by simple urine dry chemistry method for detecting WBC in urine,experi-mental group was examined by urinary sediment microscopy method on the basis of urine dry chemistry method. The error rate and urine WBC test results were compared and analyzed. Results The general error rate of experimental group(0. 18% )was significant lower than that of control group(2. 54% ),the difference was statistically significant( P < 0. 05). There was no significant difference( P ﹥ 0. 05) in urine WBC positive rate between experimental group(60. 91% )and control group(57. 64% ). Conclusion Combined use of urine dry chemistry method and urinary sediment microscopy method has high accuracy and low general error rate in WBC examination.
