当代医学
噹代醫學
당대의학
CHINA CONTEMPORARY MEDICINE
2013年
19期
119-120,121
,共3页
刘贤团%李连娣%陈繁花%吴美婷
劉賢糰%李連娣%陳繁花%吳美婷
류현단%리련제%진번화%오미정
结直肠癌%循证护理%生活质量%干预
結直腸癌%循證護理%生活質量%榦預
결직장암%순증호리%생활질량%간예
Colorectal Cancer%Evidence-Based Nursing%Quality of Life
目的探究循证护理干预对结直肠癌患者生活质量的影响。方法选择2011年2月-2012年12月收治64例结直肠癌住院患者,随机分为对照组和实验组,对照组只采用常规护理方法,实验组采用循证护理干预,包括心理干预、家庭干预、饮食干预、造口方面护理干预等,采用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)开发的癌症患者生命质量核心量表(EORTC QL Q-C 30)对两组的生活质量进行评价。结果实验组干预前后比较发现,干预后的生活质量明显比干预前的高,存在差异统计学意义(P<0.05),干预后,实验组与对照组比较,患者的生活质量也有明显的提高,差异有显著性(P<0.05)。结论循证护理干预措施能够较好地改善结直肠癌肠患者的生活质量,作为一种辅助疗法,治疗效果较好,可参考应用推广。
目的探究循證護理榦預對結直腸癌患者生活質量的影響。方法選擇2011年2月-2012年12月收治64例結直腸癌住院患者,隨機分為對照組和實驗組,對照組隻採用常規護理方法,實驗組採用循證護理榦預,包括心理榦預、傢庭榦預、飲食榦預、造口方麵護理榦預等,採用歐洲癌癥研究與治療組織(EORTC)開髮的癌癥患者生命質量覈心量錶(EORTC QL Q-C 30)對兩組的生活質量進行評價。結果實驗組榦預前後比較髮現,榦預後的生活質量明顯比榦預前的高,存在差異統計學意義(P<0.05),榦預後,實驗組與對照組比較,患者的生活質量也有明顯的提高,差異有顯著性(P<0.05)。結論循證護理榦預措施能夠較好地改善結直腸癌腸患者的生活質量,作為一種輔助療法,治療效果較好,可參攷應用推廣。
목적탐구순증호리간예대결직장암환자생활질량적영향。방법선택2011년2월-2012년12월수치64례결직장암주원환자,수궤분위대조조화실험조,대조조지채용상규호리방법,실험조채용순증호리간예,포괄심리간예、가정간예、음식간예、조구방면호리간예등,채용구주암증연구여치료조직(EORTC)개발적암증환자생명질량핵심량표(EORTC QL Q-C 30)대량조적생활질량진행평개。결과실험조간예전후비교발현,간예후적생활질량명현비간예전적고,존재차이통계학의의(P<0.05),간예후,실험조여대조조비교,환자적생활질량야유명현적제고,차이유현저성(P<0.05)。결론순증호리간예조시능구교호지개선결직장암장환자적생활질량,작위일충보조요법,치료효과교호,가삼고응용추엄。
Objective To explore the influence of evidence-based nursing intervention on quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer. Methods Retrospective analysis of our tumor 64 cases hospitalized with clinical data of colorectal cancer patients, were randomLy divided into control group and experimental group, the control group only received routine nursing care, the experimental group using evidence-based nursing intervention, including psychological intervention, family intervention, diet intervention, stoma nursing intervention, using the European Organization for research and treatment of cancer (EORTC) quality of life in patients with cancer of the core scale development (EORTC QL Q-C 30) of the two groups to evaluate the quality of life, the whole function, role function, emotional function, cognitive function, social function, quality of life higher scores indicate a higher quality of life. Results The experimental group did the quality of life and intervention outcomes of patients were improved obviously, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05), intervention, comparison between the experimental group and routine nursing group, also have significantly improved the quality of life of the patients, there was a significant difference (P<0.05). Conclusion The evidence-based nursing intervention can effectively improve the quality of life of patients with colostomy for rectal cancer patients with colostomy for rectal cancer, is an ideal and effective adjuvant therapy.