中国医药指南
中國醫藥指南
중국의약지남
CHINA MEDICINE GUIDE
2014年
12期
18-18,19
,共2页
微型种植体%矫治%双颌前突
微型種植體%矯治%雙頜前突
미형충식체%교치%쌍합전돌
Mini implants%Treatment%Bimaxillary protrusion
目的：探讨微型种植体矫治双颌前突的临床治疗效果。方法选自2012年1月至2013年1月进入到我院进行治疗的双颌前突患者70例，将这70例患者随机分成2组，每组45例患者，分别命名为观察组和对照组。对观察组的35例患者采用微型种植体的方法进行矫治，对对照组的35例患者不进行微型种植体支持矫治，观察2组患者的临床治疗效果。结果观察组35例患者采用微型种植体矫治的方式进行治疗，显效22例，占该组临床总人数的62.9%，有效12例，占该组临床总人数的34.3%，无效1例，占该组临床总人数的2.8%，观察组临床治疗的总有效率为97.2%。对照组35例患者不采用微型种植体矫治的方式进行治疗，显效20例，占该组临床总人数的57.1%，有效10例，占该组临床总人数的28.6%，无效5例，占该组临床总人数的14.3%，对照组临床治疗的总有效率为85.7%。结论采用微型种植体矫治双颌前突临床效果显著，值得临床推广。
目的：探討微型種植體矯治雙頜前突的臨床治療效果。方法選自2012年1月至2013年1月進入到我院進行治療的雙頜前突患者70例，將這70例患者隨機分成2組，每組45例患者，分彆命名為觀察組和對照組。對觀察組的35例患者採用微型種植體的方法進行矯治，對對照組的35例患者不進行微型種植體支持矯治，觀察2組患者的臨床治療效果。結果觀察組35例患者採用微型種植體矯治的方式進行治療，顯效22例，佔該組臨床總人數的62.9%，有效12例，佔該組臨床總人數的34.3%，無效1例，佔該組臨床總人數的2.8%，觀察組臨床治療的總有效率為97.2%。對照組35例患者不採用微型種植體矯治的方式進行治療，顯效20例，佔該組臨床總人數的57.1%，有效10例，佔該組臨床總人數的28.6%，無效5例，佔該組臨床總人數的14.3%，對照組臨床治療的總有效率為85.7%。結論採用微型種植體矯治雙頜前突臨床效果顯著，值得臨床推廣。
목적：탐토미형충식체교치쌍합전돌적림상치료효과。방법선자2012년1월지2013년1월진입도아원진행치료적쌍합전돌환자70례，장저70례환자수궤분성2조，매조45례환자，분별명명위관찰조화대조조。대관찰조적35례환자채용미형충식체적방법진행교치，대대조조적35례환자불진행미형충식체지지교치，관찰2조환자적림상치료효과。결과관찰조35례환자채용미형충식체교치적방식진행치료，현효22례，점해조림상총인수적62.9%，유효12례，점해조림상총인수적34.3%，무효1례，점해조림상총인수적2.8%，관찰조림상치료적총유효솔위97.2%。대조조35례환자불채용미형충식체교치적방식진행치료，현효20례，점해조림상총인수적57.1%，유효10례，점해조림상총인수적28.6%，무효5례，점해조림상총인수적14.3%，대조조림상치료적총유효솔위85.7%。결론채용미형충식체교치쌍합전돌림상효과현저，치득림상추엄。
Objective To investigate the micro-implant treatment bimaxil ary protrusion clinical effect. Methods Selected from January 2012 to January 2013 into the hospital for treatment of bimaxil ary protrusion 70 patients, these 70 patients were randomly divided into two groups, 45 patients in each group were named as observation group and control group. On the observation group, 35 patients were treated with micro-implant treatment method for the control group of 35 patients without micro-implant-supported treatment, observed two groups of patients with clinical effect. Results 35 patients were treated with micro-implant treatment approach to treatment, effective in 22 cases, accounting for the group 62.9%of the total number of clinical y effective in 12 cases, accounting for the group 34.3%of the total number of clinical, ineffective in 1 case, this group of 2.8%of the total number of clinical, clinical observation group was 97.2%of the total effective rate. Control group of 35 patients without treatment approach using micro-implant treatment, effective in 20 cases, accounting for the total number of the group of clinical 57.1%effective in 10 cases, accounting for the total number of the group's 28.6%clinical, ineffective in 5 cases, accounting for the group, 14.3%of the total number of clinical, clinical treatment control group, the total effective rate was 85.7%. Conclusion The micro-implant treatment bimaxil ary protrusion significant clinical effect, worthy of promotion.
