中国医学创新
中國醫學創新
중국의학창신
MEDICAL INNOVATION OF CHINA
2013年
19期
50-51,52
,共3页
毛细支气管炎%氧驱动雾化吸入%布地奈德%异丙托溴铵%超声雾化吸入
毛細支氣管炎%氧驅動霧化吸入%佈地奈德%異丙託溴銨%超聲霧化吸入
모세지기관염%양구동무화흡입%포지내덕%이병탁추안%초성무화흡입
Bronchiolitis%Oxygen atomizing inhalation%Budesonide%Ipratropium%Ultrasonic atomizing inhalation
目的:观察布地奈德和异丙托溴铵氧驱动雾化吸入治疗毛细支气管炎的临床疗效。方法:将68例毛细支气管炎患儿随机分为两组,两组均给予常规治疗,在此基础上,观察组35例给予布地奈德和异丙托溴铵氧驱动面罩雾化吸入。对照组33例给予庆大霉素、α-糜蛋白酶、地塞米松进行超声雾化吸入。疗程均为5~7 d,2次/d,观察两组的疗效。结果:观察组总有效率为97.14%,高于对照组的66.67%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论:布地奈德和异丙托溴铵氧驱动雾化吸入治疗毛细支气管炎疗效明显高于对照组,且缩短了疗程,药物全身不良反应小,更简便易行,值得临床推广应用。
目的:觀察佈地奈德和異丙託溴銨氧驅動霧化吸入治療毛細支氣管炎的臨床療效。方法:將68例毛細支氣管炎患兒隨機分為兩組,兩組均給予常規治療,在此基礎上,觀察組35例給予佈地奈德和異丙託溴銨氧驅動麵罩霧化吸入。對照組33例給予慶大黴素、α-糜蛋白酶、地塞米鬆進行超聲霧化吸入。療程均為5~7 d,2次/d,觀察兩組的療效。結果:觀察組總有效率為97.14%,高于對照組的66.67%,差異有統計學意義(P<0.01)。結論:佈地奈德和異丙託溴銨氧驅動霧化吸入治療毛細支氣管炎療效明顯高于對照組,且縮短瞭療程,藥物全身不良反應小,更簡便易行,值得臨床推廣應用。
목적:관찰포지내덕화이병탁추안양구동무화흡입치료모세지기관염적림상료효。방법:장68례모세지기관염환인수궤분위량조,량조균급여상규치료,재차기출상,관찰조35례급여포지내덕화이병탁추안양구동면조무화흡입。대조조33례급여경대매소、α-미단백매、지새미송진행초성무화흡입。료정균위5~7 d,2차/d,관찰량조적료효。결과:관찰조총유효솔위97.14%,고우대조조적66.67%,차이유통계학의의(P<0.01)。결론:포지내덕화이병탁추안양구동무화흡입치료모세지기관염료효명현고우대조조,차축단료료정,약물전신불량반응소,경간편역행,치득림상추엄응용。
Objective:To observe the effect of budesonide and ipratropium bromide oxygen atomizing inhalation to treat bronchiolitis clinical curative effect.Method:68 cases of bronchiolitis were randomly divided into 2 groups,two groups were given routine treatment,the observation group 35 cases were given budesonide,ipratropium bromide oxygen drive atomization inhalation mask too.33 patients of control group were given gentamicin too,chymotrypsin,ultrasonic atomizing inhalation of dexamethasone.Treatment lasted for 5-7 days,2 times/day,curative effect of the two groups were observed.Result:In the observation group,the total efficiency was 97.14%,it’s higher than 66.67% in the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.01).Conclusion:Budesonide and ipratropium bromide oxygen atomizing inhalation treatment of bronchiolitis is significantly higher than that of the control group,and shorten the course of treatment,the general drug adverse reactions.it’s more convenient,and worthy of clinical application.