岭南急诊医学杂志
嶺南急診醫學雜誌
령남급진의학잡지
LINGNAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
2013年
1期
36-37,51
,共3页
徐志锋%王力军%余梅娟%高永祺%李志全
徐誌鋒%王力軍%餘梅娟%高永祺%李誌全
서지봉%왕력군%여매연%고영기%리지전
醒脑静注射液%发热%干预
醒腦靜註射液%髮熱%榦預
성뇌정주사액%발열%간예
Xingnaojing injection%fever%intervention
目的:探讨醒脑静注射液对感染性发热的干预作用。方法:将210例急性感染性发热患者按感染的判定标准分为病毒组115例与细菌组95例,病毒组随机分为治疗 A 组65例和对照 A 组50例;细菌组分为治疗B 组52例和对照B 组43例。对照组常规治疗,治疗组加用醒脑静治疗。比较各组体温变化、醒脑静注射液对发热的干预。结果:治疗 A 组用药后2 h、4 h 的退热效果、退热时间(4.3±2.7)h、发热次数(3.0±1.4)次、疗程(3.8±1.6)d 均显著优于对照 A 组(P <0.01);治疗 B 组4h 的退热效果和退热时间(6.5±3.3)h 明显优于对照 B组(P <0.05);但发热次数(5.5±1.8)次和疗程(7.3±2.4)d 无明显改善(P >0.05)。结论:醒脑静注射液对病毒感染性发热退热有效、迅速,减少再发热,有效缩短病程,能明显干预病毒感染所致的发热过程。
目的:探討醒腦靜註射液對感染性髮熱的榦預作用。方法:將210例急性感染性髮熱患者按感染的判定標準分為病毒組115例與細菌組95例,病毒組隨機分為治療 A 組65例和對照 A 組50例;細菌組分為治療B 組52例和對照B 組43例。對照組常規治療,治療組加用醒腦靜治療。比較各組體溫變化、醒腦靜註射液對髮熱的榦預。結果:治療 A 組用藥後2 h、4 h 的退熱效果、退熱時間(4.3±2.7)h、髮熱次數(3.0±1.4)次、療程(3.8±1.6)d 均顯著優于對照 A 組(P <0.01);治療 B 組4h 的退熱效果和退熱時間(6.5±3.3)h 明顯優于對照 B組(P <0.05);但髮熱次數(5.5±1.8)次和療程(7.3±2.4)d 無明顯改善(P >0.05)。結論:醒腦靜註射液對病毒感染性髮熱退熱有效、迅速,減少再髮熱,有效縮短病程,能明顯榦預病毒感染所緻的髮熱過程。
목적:탐토성뇌정주사액대감염성발열적간예작용。방법:장210례급성감염성발열환자안감염적판정표준분위병독조115례여세균조95례,병독조수궤분위치료 A 조65례화대조 A 조50례;세균조분위치료B 조52례화대조B 조43례。대조조상규치료,치료조가용성뇌정치료。비교각조체온변화、성뇌정주사액대발열적간예。결과:치료 A 조용약후2 h、4 h 적퇴열효과、퇴열시간(4.3±2.7)h、발열차수(3.0±1.4)차、료정(3.8±1.6)d 균현저우우대조 A 조(P <0.01);치료 B 조4h 적퇴열효과화퇴열시간(6.5±3.3)h 명현우우대조 B조(P <0.05);단발열차수(5.5±1.8)차화료정(7.3±2.4)d 무명현개선(P >0.05)。결론:성뇌정주사액대병독감염성발열퇴열유효、신속,감소재발열,유효축단병정,능명현간예병독감염소치적발열과정。
Objective: To explore the effect of Xingnaojing injection intervention in infective fever. Methods:210 patients with acute infective fever were divided into viral infection group (n=115) and bacterial infection group (n=95). Viral infection group was divided into treatment group A (n=65) and control group (n=50). Bacterial infection group was divided into treatment group B (n=52) and control group (n=43). The control groups were treated by routine measurement, while the treatment groups were treated by Xingnaojing injection based on the control groups. The changes of temperature and the intervention of Xingnaojing were compared in different groups. Results: After 2h, 4h of treatment, the antipyretic effect,defervescence time (4.3±2.7)h, times of fever(3.0±1.4), course of treatment (3.8±1.6)d in treatment group A were significantly better than those in control group A (P < 0.01),the antipyretic effect and defervescence time (6.5±3.3)h in treatment group B were better than those in control subgroup B (P <0.05), but the times of fever(5.5±1.8) and course of treatment(7.3±2.4)d were not improved obviously(P > 0.05). Conclusions: Xingnaojing injection can depress the fever induced by viral infection effectively and rapidly, reduce the course of treatment and interfere the course of fever induced by viral infection.