教育生物学杂志
教育生物學雜誌
교육생물학잡지
2013年
2期
124-135
,共12页
陈汝亮%黄玫芳%霍泰辉%冯国培%区洁心%关定辉%杜祖贻
陳汝亮%黃玫芳%霍泰輝%馮國培%區潔心%關定輝%杜祖貽
진여량%황매방%곽태휘%풍국배%구길심%관정휘%두조이
阅读%语音处理%脑活动
閱讀%語音處理%腦活動
열독%어음처리%뇌활동
reading%phonological processing%brain activation
大量研究结果表明,在语音理解的试验中,以英语为母语的儿童其阅读能力与脑活动分布有一定联系。然而,对于不同阅读能力中国儿童的神经认知处理鲜有报道。为探讨中文处理的神经认知及与阅读能力的关系,17名以粤语为母语的6岁学童参与了本研究。根据其中文阅读能力测试分为三组:低能力读者为阅读能力低于文化平均值下2/3标准差者;一般能力读者为阅读能力在文化平均值2/3标准差内者;高能力读者为阅读能力高于文化平均值下2/3标准差者。试验中,儿童会听见12对平均分布在3个刺激段的中文音节,其须判断该对中文音节是否同韵。采用1.5T磁共振仪(依靠血氧水平对比)全程记录儿童脑活动,分析不同阅读能力儿童在语音敏感度上是否存在神经认知方面的差异。
大量研究結果錶明,在語音理解的試驗中,以英語為母語的兒童其閱讀能力與腦活動分佈有一定聯繫。然而,對于不同閱讀能力中國兒童的神經認知處理鮮有報道。為探討中文處理的神經認知及與閱讀能力的關繫,17名以粵語為母語的6歲學童參與瞭本研究。根據其中文閱讀能力測試分為三組:低能力讀者為閱讀能力低于文化平均值下2/3標準差者;一般能力讀者為閱讀能力在文化平均值2/3標準差內者;高能力讀者為閱讀能力高于文化平均值下2/3標準差者。試驗中,兒童會聽見12對平均分佈在3箇刺激段的中文音節,其鬚判斷該對中文音節是否同韻。採用1.5T磁共振儀(依靠血氧水平對比)全程記錄兒童腦活動,分析不同閱讀能力兒童在語音敏感度上是否存在神經認知方麵的差異。
대량연구결과표명,재어음리해적시험중,이영어위모어적인동기열독능력여뇌활동분포유일정련계。연이,대우불동열독능력중국인동적신경인지처리선유보도。위탐토중문처리적신경인지급여열독능력적관계,17명이월어위모어적6세학동삼여료본연구。근거기중문열독능력측시분위삼조:저능력독자위열독능력저우문화평균치하2/3표준차자;일반능력독자위열독능력재문화평균치2/3표준차내자;고능력독자위열독능력고우문화평균치하2/3표준차자。시험중,인동회은견12대평균분포재3개자격단적중문음절,기수판단해대중문음절시부동운。채용1.5T자공진의(의고혈양수평대비)전정기록인동뇌활동,분석불동열독능력인동재어음민감도상시부존재신경인지방면적차이。
While imaging studies with English-speaking children showed that reading achieve-ment of children is associated with their brain profiles during speech perception tasks , little is known about the neurocognitive processing of normal Chinese students with different reading proficiencies. To study the neurocognitive processing on Chinese and the input of reading level on the process, seventeen six year old students with Chinese as their first language were recruited for the research study. These students were further assessed by a reading test to distinguish their Chinese reading ability. Those scored 2/3 deviation below the cultural mean score were classified as low-proficiency readers. Those scored between 2/3 below or above the mean score were classified as intermediate-proficiency readers. Those scored 2/3 standard deviation above the mean score were regarded as high-proficiency readers. During the experiment, 12 pairs of Chinese syllables evenly distributed in three stimuli blocks were presented to the students acoustically and they had to judge whether each pair of syllables was the same in rhyme or not. Throughout the whole process the students’ brain activation profiles were assessed by fMRI examination using the BOLD (blood oxygen level dependent) contrast method in a 1.5T MRI system. Result analysis was focused on the possible neurocognitive discrepancies between students of varying reading proficiency on phonological sensitivity.