南方医科大学学报
南方醫科大學學報
남방의과대학학보
JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY
2014年
6期
857-861
,共5页
谢多%邱卓琳%罗琛%褚庆军%全松
謝多%邱卓琳%囉琛%褚慶軍%全鬆
사다%구탁림%라침%저경군%전송
卵胞浆内单精子注射技术%精子来源%胚胎质量%胚胎发育潜能
卵胞漿內單精子註射技術%精子來源%胚胎質量%胚胎髮育潛能
란포장내단정자주사기술%정자래원%배태질량%배태발육잠능
intracytoplasmic sperm injection%sources of spermatozoa%embryo quality%blastocyst%developmental potential,embryo
目的:研究卵胞浆内单精子注射技术(ICSI)中不同来源精子对卵母细胞受精、胚胎质量及发育潜能的影响。方法回顾性分析我中心因单纯男性因素行ICSI助孕治疗的197例患者的临床资料,按不同精子来源分为射精组(n=102)、PESA组(n=68)、TESA组(n=27)3组,其中将射精组又分为严重少弱畸精子症组(n=67)和隐匿精子症组(n=35)。比较4组间受精率、优质胚胎率、新鲜胚胎移植周期的着床率及妊娠率,以及低质胚胎继续培养的优质囊胚形成率。结果少弱畸精子射精组、隐匿精子射精组、PESA组、TESA组的正常受精率分别为64.8%、62.1%、75.6%、61.6%,其中PESA组明显高于其它3组(P<0.05),4组的优质胚胎率、新鲜胚胎移植周期的着床率及妊娠率无明显差异(P>0.05)。4组间低质胚胎继续培养的优质囊胚形成率也无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论PESA来源的精子ICSI中正常受精率较高,但在ICSI中不同来源精子对胚胎质量及发育潜能无显著影响。
目的:研究卵胞漿內單精子註射技術(ICSI)中不同來源精子對卵母細胞受精、胚胎質量及髮育潛能的影響。方法迴顧性分析我中心因單純男性因素行ICSI助孕治療的197例患者的臨床資料,按不同精子來源分為射精組(n=102)、PESA組(n=68)、TESA組(n=27)3組,其中將射精組又分為嚴重少弱畸精子癥組(n=67)和隱匿精子癥組(n=35)。比較4組間受精率、優質胚胎率、新鮮胚胎移植週期的著床率及妊娠率,以及低質胚胎繼續培養的優質囊胚形成率。結果少弱畸精子射精組、隱匿精子射精組、PESA組、TESA組的正常受精率分彆為64.8%、62.1%、75.6%、61.6%,其中PESA組明顯高于其它3組(P<0.05),4組的優質胚胎率、新鮮胚胎移植週期的著床率及妊娠率無明顯差異(P>0.05)。4組間低質胚胎繼續培養的優質囊胚形成率也無顯著差異(P>0.05)。結論PESA來源的精子ICSI中正常受精率較高,但在ICSI中不同來源精子對胚胎質量及髮育潛能無顯著影響。
목적:연구란포장내단정자주사기술(ICSI)중불동래원정자대란모세포수정、배태질량급발육잠능적영향。방법회고성분석아중심인단순남성인소행ICSI조잉치료적197례환자적림상자료,안불동정자래원분위사정조(n=102)、PESA조(n=68)、TESA조(n=27)3조,기중장사정조우분위엄중소약기정자증조(n=67)화은닉정자증조(n=35)。비교4조간수정솔、우질배태솔、신선배태이식주기적착상솔급임신솔,이급저질배태계속배양적우질낭배형성솔。결과소약기정자사정조、은닉정자사정조、PESA조、TESA조적정상수정솔분별위64.8%、62.1%、75.6%、61.6%,기중PESA조명현고우기타3조(P<0.05),4조적우질배태솔、신선배태이식주기적착상솔급임신솔무명현차이(P>0.05)。4조간저질배태계속배양적우질낭배형성솔야무현저차이(P>0.05)。결론PESA래원적정자ICSI중정상수정솔교고,단재ICSI중불동래원정자대배태질량급발육잠능무현저영향。
Objective To evaluate the impact of spermatozoa from different sources on normal fertilization of oocytes, embryo quality and embryo developmental potential in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted among 197 patients undergoing ICSI cycles in our center. The patients were classified into 3 groups according to the sources of semen, namely ejaculated spermatozoa group (n=102), percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration (PESA) group (n=68), and testicular sperm aspiration (TESA) group (n=27). The ejaculated spermatozoa group was further classified into oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (n=67) and cryptozoospermia (n=35) subgroups. The normal fertilization, high-quality embryo, implantation and clinical pregnancy rates were compared among the groups; the rate of high-quality blastocyst formation in in-vitro culture of non-top quality embryos was also observed. Results The patients with PESA showed significantly higher normal fertilization rate (75.6%) than those in oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (64.8%), cryptozoospermia (62.1%), and TESA (61.6%) groups (P<0.05). No significant differences were found in the high-quality embryo, implantation, and clinical pregnancy rates among the groups (P>0.05). The rate of high-quality blastocyst formation in the in-vitro culture of non-top quality embryos was also comparable among the groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Although spermatozoa obtained with by PESA is associated with a higher normal fertilization rate, the sources of spermatozoa do not significantly affect the embryonic quality and developmental potential in ICSI cycles.