CAJ | 학술논문

　　目的比较Braden（修订版）评估表与国内评分法预测肿瘤患者发生压疮的效果。方法用Braden（修订版）评估表与国内评分法评估125例肿瘤患者，计算两种评估表预测压疮的灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值。结果压疮发生率17．60％，Braden评估表、国内评分法的最佳诊断界值分别为16分、24分，Braden评估表的灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为40．91％、66．99％、20．93％、84．15％，国内评分法分别为72．72％、38．83％、20．25％、86．96％。结论国内评分法预测肿瘤患者发生压疮的效果较好。
　　목적비교Braden（수정판）평고표여국내평분법예측종류환자발생압창적효과。방법용Braden（수정판）평고표여국내평분법평고125례종류환자，계산량충평고표예측압창적령민도、특이도、양성예측치、음성예측치。결과압창발생솔17．60％，Braden평고표、국내평분법적최가진단계치분별위16분、24분，Braden평고표적령민도、특이도、양성예측치、음성예측치분별위40．91％、66．99％、20．93％、84．15％，국내평분법분별위72．72％、38．83％、20．25％、86．96％。결론국내평분법예측종류환자발생압창적효과교호。
Objective To compare the predictive effects of the modified Braden scale and China (Mainland) scale on assessment of pressure ulcer risk among tumor patients .Methods One hundred and twenty-five tumor patients were assessed with the modified Braden scale and China (Mainland) scale,the sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value,and negative predictive value of the two scales were calculated .Results The incidence of pressure ulcer was 17.60%,the ideal cutoff value of the modified Braden scale was 16 while of the China(mainland) scale was 24.The sensitivity,specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the modified Braden scale were 40.91%,66.99%,20.93%,84.15%,respectively,which of the China (Mainland) scale were 72.72%,38.83%, 20.25%,86.96%,respectively.Conclusion The China (Mainland) scale is a better predictor of pressure ulcer for tumor patients.