中国保健营养（中旬刊）
中國保健營養（中旬刊）
중국보건영양（중순간）
China Hwalth Care & nutrition
2013年
5期
65-66
,共2页
CCU%围手术期%护患沟通%干预措施%效果
CCU%圍手術期%護患溝通%榦預措施%效果
CCU%위수술기%호환구통%간예조시%효과
CCU%Perioperative docter-patient%communication%intervention%effects
目的：探讨CCU病房特殊环境里护患沟通方案对行PTCA及冠脉支架植入术患者的预后效果的相关性研究。方法：将146例行心脏介入检查和(或)治疗的患者随机分成对照组和实验组，实验组除接受常规治疗和由心血管介入医生的医患沟通外，术前一天还接受冠心病监护病房(CCU)特定的护患沟通方案。其效果两组采用相同的评价方法。结果：两组患者相同时段自评结果显示，实验组的STAI状态特质评分明显低于对照组（p<0.05），SF-12身体状态和精神状况两方面评分均好于对照组（p分别<0.05和<0.01）。APAIS评分改善（p<0.05）。结论：对拟行冠脉介入检查和(或)治疗的CCU患者，实施针对性的护患沟通，能降低患者术后的不良反应，改善出院后的生活质量。
目的：探討CCU病房特殊環境裏護患溝通方案對行PTCA及冠脈支架植入術患者的預後效果的相關性研究。方法：將146例行心髒介入檢查和(或)治療的患者隨機分成對照組和實驗組，實驗組除接受常規治療和由心血管介入醫生的醫患溝通外，術前一天還接受冠心病鑑護病房(CCU)特定的護患溝通方案。其效果兩組採用相同的評價方法。結果：兩組患者相同時段自評結果顯示，實驗組的STAI狀態特質評分明顯低于對照組（p<0.05），SF-12身體狀態和精神狀況兩方麵評分均好于對照組（p分彆<0.05和<0.01）。APAIS評分改善（p<0.05）。結論：對擬行冠脈介入檢查和(或)治療的CCU患者，實施針對性的護患溝通，能降低患者術後的不良反應，改善齣院後的生活質量。
목적：탐토CCU병방특수배경리호환구통방안대행PTCA급관맥지가식입술환자적예후효과적상관성연구。방법：장146례행심장개입검사화(혹)치료적환자수궤분성대조조화실험조，실험조제접수상규치료화유심혈관개입의생적의환구통외，술전일천환접수관심병감호병방(CCU)특정적호환구통방안。기효과량조채용상동적평개방법。결과：량조환자상동시단자평결과현시，실험조적STAI상태특질평분명현저우대조조（p<0.05），SF-12신체상태화정신상황량방면평분균호우대조조（p분별<0.05화<0.01）。APAIS평분개선（p<0.05）。결론：대의행관맥개입검사화(혹)치료적CCU환자，실시침대성적호환구통，능강저환자술후적불량반응，개선출원후적생활질량。
Objective:To investigate the special environment of CCU patient communication programs on line PTCA and coronary stent implantation in the patient's prognosis-related research. Method:146 checks and routine cardiac intervention (or) treatment were randomly divided into control and experimental groups, in addition to the experimental group received conventional treatment and cardiovascular intervention by the doctor patient communication, the day before surgery also received coronary care unit(CCU) specific doctor-patient communication program.The effect of the two groups using the same evaluation methods.Results:There were the same time self-assessment showed that the experimental group STAI State-Trait score was significantly lower than the control group (p<0.05), SF-12 physical and mental condition of both status scores were bet er than the control group (p were<0.05and<0.01).APAIS score improvement (p<0.05).Conclusion:coronary intervention for the proposed examination and (or) in the treatment of CCU patients, the implementation of specific physician-patient communication, patients can reduce adverse reactions and improve the quality of life after discharge.
