中外医学研究
中外醫學研究
중외의학연구
CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICAL RESEARCH
2014年
13期
5-6,7
,共3页
引导式教育%脑性瘫痪%粗大运动功能%社区
引導式教育%腦性癱瘓%粗大運動功能%社區
인도식교육%뇌성탄탄%조대운동공능%사구
Conductive education%Cerebral palsy%Gross motor function%Community
目的:探讨引导式教育训练方法与传统式一对一的康复训练方法对社区脑瘫儿童粗大运动功能康复疗效的影响。方法:选择社区58例接受康复训练12个月以上的脑瘫儿童作为观察对象,并随机分为引导式教育训练组和传统式一对一康复训练组,并在治疗前后进行粗大运动功能(GMFM)测评,将结果进行方差分析。结果:训练前两组患儿GMFM评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。康复训练前后GMFM评分比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),康复训练后两组GMFM评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:引导式教育训练方法和传统式一对一康复训练方法在社区对脑瘫儿童粗大运动功能康复疗效具有同等影响作用。
目的:探討引導式教育訓練方法與傳統式一對一的康複訓練方法對社區腦癱兒童粗大運動功能康複療效的影響。方法:選擇社區58例接受康複訓練12箇月以上的腦癱兒童作為觀察對象,併隨機分為引導式教育訓練組和傳統式一對一康複訓練組,併在治療前後進行粗大運動功能(GMFM)測評,將結果進行方差分析。結果:訓練前兩組患兒GMFM評分比較,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。康複訓練前後GMFM評分比較,差異有統計學意義(P<0.01),康複訓練後兩組GMFM評分比較,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論:引導式教育訓練方法和傳統式一對一康複訓練方法在社區對腦癱兒童粗大運動功能康複療效具有同等影響作用。
목적:탐토인도식교육훈련방법여전통식일대일적강복훈련방법대사구뇌탄인동조대운동공능강복료효적영향。방법:선택사구58례접수강복훈련12개월이상적뇌탄인동작위관찰대상,병수궤분위인도식교육훈련조화전통식일대일강복훈련조,병재치료전후진행조대운동공능(GMFM)측평,장결과진행방차분석。결과:훈련전량조환인GMFM평분비교,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。강복훈련전후GMFM평분비교,차이유통계학의의(P<0.01),강복훈련후량조GMFM평분비교,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론:인도식교육훈련방법화전통식일대일강복훈련방법재사구대뇌탄인동조대운동공능강복료효구유동등영향작용。
Objective:To explore the effect of rehabilitation training guidance education training methodand traditional one on one on the rehabilitation of children with cerebral palsy gross motorfunctional efficacy of community.Method:58 children of community received rehabilitation training for more than 12 months with cerebral palsy were selected and randomly divided into guiding education training group and traditional form of rehabilitation training group,and comparing the gross motor function before and after treatment by GMFM evaluation,the results were analysis of variance.Result:The patients of two groups before training GMFM score had no significant difference(P>0.05),after training GMFM scores was statistically significant difference(P<0.01),after rehabilitation treatment of two groups GMFM scores had no significant difference(P>0.05).Conclusion:Conductive educationtraining method and traditional one on one training methods in the community on grossmotor function in children with cerebral palsy rehabilitation effect has the same effect.