中国组织工程研究
中國組織工程研究
중국조직공정연구
Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research
2013年
33期
5963-5968
,共6页
秦小霞%王豫蓉%文华%汪杰%马策
秦小霞%王豫蓉%文華%汪傑%馬策
진소하%왕예용%문화%왕걸%마책
组织构建%口腔组织构建%垂直骨面型%软组织颏部%美学%侧貌%口腔正畸%颏部形态
組織構建%口腔組織構建%垂直骨麵型%軟組織頦部%美學%側貌%口腔正畸%頦部形態
조직구건%구강조직구건%수직골면형%연조직해부%미학%측모%구강정기%해부형태
tissue construction%oral tissue construction%vertical facial types%soft tissue chin%esthetics%profile%orthodontics%chin morphology
背景:不同的垂直骨面型的个体,颏部形态也各不相同。那么不同垂直骨面型的个体,颏部形态分别表现为怎样才是最美观的?<br> 目的:评价垂直骨面型与颏部形态两种因素同时对侧貌美观影响。<br> 方法:选择美貌的高均低角女性各一位,由同一摄影师拍摄自然头位侧貌相片。在侧貌照片上,通过小范围的(2 mm为一个单位)改变颏部矢状向和垂直向位置,生成一系列图片。选取17名正畸医生和35名普通人分别对生成的照片进行美学评分,以此评价不同垂直骨面型者的颏部美观。<br> 结果与结论:高角者颏部高度轻微变化无美观差异;颏部轻微前突较轻微后缩美观。均角者颏部高度较低者更美观;颏部轻微前突较过分前突和后缩美观。低角者颏部较高更美观;颏部轻微前突较过分前突和后缩美观。说明垂直骨面型与颏部形态对侧貌的影响各不相同,正畸临床中应参考患者的垂直骨面型来改变患者的颏部形态,以为患者获得较好的侧貌。
揹景:不同的垂直骨麵型的箇體,頦部形態也各不相同。那麽不同垂直骨麵型的箇體,頦部形態分彆錶現為怎樣纔是最美觀的?<br> 目的:評價垂直骨麵型與頦部形態兩種因素同時對側貌美觀影響。<br> 方法:選擇美貌的高均低角女性各一位,由同一攝影師拍攝自然頭位側貌相片。在側貌照片上,通過小範圍的(2 mm為一箇單位)改變頦部矢狀嚮和垂直嚮位置,生成一繫列圖片。選取17名正畸醫生和35名普通人分彆對生成的照片進行美學評分,以此評價不同垂直骨麵型者的頦部美觀。<br> 結果與結論:高角者頦部高度輕微變化無美觀差異;頦部輕微前突較輕微後縮美觀。均角者頦部高度較低者更美觀;頦部輕微前突較過分前突和後縮美觀。低角者頦部較高更美觀;頦部輕微前突較過分前突和後縮美觀。說明垂直骨麵型與頦部形態對側貌的影響各不相同,正畸臨床中應參攷患者的垂直骨麵型來改變患者的頦部形態,以為患者穫得較好的側貌。
배경:불동적수직골면형적개체,해부형태야각불상동。나요불동수직골면형적개체,해부형태분별표현위즘양재시최미관적?<br> 목적:평개수직골면형여해부형태량충인소동시대측모미관영향。<br> 방법:선택미모적고균저각녀성각일위,유동일섭영사박섭자연두위측모상편。재측모조편상,통과소범위적(2 mm위일개단위)개변해부시상향화수직향위치,생성일계렬도편。선취17명정기의생화35명보통인분별대생성적조편진행미학평분,이차평개불동수직골면형자적해부미관。<br> 결과여결론:고각자해부고도경미변화무미관차이;해부경미전돌교경미후축미관。균각자해부고도교저자경미관;해부경미전돌교과분전돌화후축미관。저각자해부교고경미관;해부경미전돌교과분전돌화후축미관。설명수직골면형여해부형태대측모적영향각불상동,정기림상중응삼고환자적수직골면형래개변환자적해부형태,이위환자획득교호적측모。
BACKGROUND:Individuals with different vertical facial types have different chin morphologies. For the individuals with different vertical facial types, what is the most beautiful chin morphology? <br> OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the effects of vertical facial types and chin morphology on facial profile attractiveness. <br> METHODS:Three beautiful females were selected, including one with high mandibular angle, one with average angle and one with low angle. Their facial profile photographs were taken. A series of new pictures were generated by the smal scale (2 mm per unit) modification of soft tissue chin in the sagittal direction and vertical direction. Raters consisting of 17 orthodontists and 35 laypersons were selected for aesthetic ratings, in order to evaluate the facial profile attractiveness of the individuals with different vertical facial types. <br> RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:There was no esthetic difference of vertical change in female with high angle;while slightly protrude chin was perceived to be more beautiful than retruded chin. For the female with average angle, lower chin was more attractive than higher chin;slightly protruded chin was beautiful than excessive protruded chin and retruded chin. For the individual with low angle, higher chin was preferred by raters;slightly protruded chin was more beautiful than excessive protruded chin and retruded chin.The results indicate that the effects of vertical facial types and chin morphology to facial profile attractiveness are different. In clinical orthodontic, vertical facial types should be taking into consideration to change the chin morphology of the patents, in order to obtain better profile attractiveness.