CAJ | 학술논문

　　目的：观察两种方案治疗反复呼吸道感染的临床疗效。方法：2009年5月～2011年5月反复呼吸道感染的60例受试者，将以上患者随机分为两组。两组患者缓解期采取常规的预防措施，急性期采取对照组：常规的西药对症治疗，治疗组：常规的西药对症治疗＋补中益气汤辨证治疗。结果：治疗组临床症状的改善优于对照组，治疗组总有效率高于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论：两种方案治疗反复呼吸道感染均有疗效，对照组治疗作用缓慢，治疗组治疗作用快且作用持久，可有效治疗患者的反复呼吸道感染，值得临床上推广应用。
　　목적：관찰량충방안치료반복호흡도감염적림상료효。방법：2009년5월～2011년5월반복호흡도감염적60례수시자，장이상환자수궤분위량조。량조환자완해기채취상규적예방조시，급성기채취대조조：상규적서약대증치료，치료조：상규적서약대증치료＋보중익기탕변증치료。결과：치료조림상증상적개선우우대조조，치료조총유효솔고우대조조，차이유통계학의의（P<0.05）。결론：량충방안치료반복호흡도감염균유료효，대조조치료작용완만，치료조치료작용쾌차작용지구，가유효치료환자적반복호흡도감염，치득림상상추엄응용。
Objective: To observe the clinical curative effect of two schemes on treating recurrent respiratory tract infections. Methods:From May 2009 to May 2011 repeated respiratory infection of 60 subjects, the more patients were randomly divided into two groups. Two groups of patients with remission routine preventive measures, and acute phase take control: the conventional modern medicine symptomatic treatment, treatment group:the conventional modern medicine symptomatic treatment combined with Buzhong Yiqi decoction syndrome differentiation and treatment. Results: The improvement of clinical symptoms of treatment group was better than control group. The total efficiency of treatment group was higher than the control group. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion:The two schemes have curative effect, treatment of recurrent respiratory tract infection control group therapy effect is slow, fast and effect in treatment group, can be effective in the treatment of patients with recurrent respiratory tract infection, is worthy of clinical application.