中国医药指南
中國醫藥指南
중국의약지남
CHINA MEDICINE GUIDE
2013年
17期
472-473
,共2页
腔镜甲状腺切除术%开放甲状腺切除术%良性甲状腺病变
腔鏡甲狀腺切除術%開放甲狀腺切除術%良性甲狀腺病變
강경갑상선절제술%개방갑상선절제술%량성갑상선병변
Endoscopic thyroidectomy%Open thyroidectomy%Benign thyroid lesions
目的探讨经乳晕入路腔镜甲状腺切除术与开放甲状腺切除术治疗良性甲状腺病变的临床手术效果。方法选取80例行甲状腺手术患者,随机分为观察组40例,对照组40例。观察组行经乳晕入路腔镜甲状腺切除术,对照组行开放甲状腺切除术,对其临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果80例甲状腺切除术均获得成功,观察组术中出血量、住院时间分别为(23±3.2)mL、(4.8±0.6)d,明显少于对照组;观察组手术效果满意度为100%,明显高于对照组57.5%,术中出血量、住院时间、满意度比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组术后均未出现并发症。结论与开放甲状腺切除术相比,腔镜甲状腺切除术具有切口小、出血少、术后恢复快及美容满意度高等优点,是一种安全可行的微创手术方法,值得临床推广应用。
目的探討經乳暈入路腔鏡甲狀腺切除術與開放甲狀腺切除術治療良性甲狀腺病變的臨床手術效果。方法選取80例行甲狀腺手術患者,隨機分為觀察組40例,對照組40例。觀察組行經乳暈入路腔鏡甲狀腺切除術,對照組行開放甲狀腺切除術,對其臨床資料進行迴顧性分析。結果80例甲狀腺切除術均穫得成功,觀察組術中齣血量、住院時間分彆為(23±3.2)mL、(4.8±0.6)d,明顯少于對照組;觀察組手術效果滿意度為100%,明顯高于對照組57.5%,術中齣血量、住院時間、滿意度比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。兩組術後均未齣現併髮癥。結論與開放甲狀腺切除術相比,腔鏡甲狀腺切除術具有切口小、齣血少、術後恢複快及美容滿意度高等優點,是一種安全可行的微創手術方法,值得臨床推廣應用。
목적탐토경유훈입로강경갑상선절제술여개방갑상선절제술치료량성갑상선병변적림상수술효과。방법선취80례행갑상선수술환자,수궤분위관찰조40례,대조조40례。관찰조행경유훈입로강경갑상선절제술,대조조행개방갑상선절제술,대기림상자료진행회고성분석。결과80례갑상선절제술균획득성공,관찰조술중출혈량、주원시간분별위(23±3.2)mL、(4.8±0.6)d,명현소우대조조;관찰조수술효과만의도위100%,명현고우대조조57.5%,술중출혈량、주원시간、만의도비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。량조술후균미출현병발증。결론여개방갑상선절제술상비,강경갑상선절제술구유절구소、출혈소、술후회복쾌급미용만의도고등우점,시일충안전가행적미창수술방법,치득림상추엄응용。
Objective To investigate the areola approach endoscopic thyroidectomy and open thyroidectomy clinical effect of surgery for the treatment of benign thyroid lesions. Methods 80 patients underwent thyroid surgery were randomly divided into observation group of 40 patients in the control group of 40 patients. The observation group was passing through the areola approach endoscopic thyroidectomy, the control group underwent open thyroidectomy, and the clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. Results 80 cases of thyroid resection were to be successful, the observation group, blood loss, hospital stay was (23±3.2)mL, (4.8±0.6)d, signiifcantly less than the control group;observation group were satisifed 100%, signiifcantly higher than 57.5%, blood loss, hospital stay, satisfaction, the difference was statistically signiifcant (P<0.05). Postoperative complications were not there. Conclusion Open thyroid resection compared to endoscopic thyroidectomy with a small incision, less bleeding, postoperative recovery was fast and beauty satisfaction is high and the advantages of minimally invasive surgery is a safe and feasible, worthy of clinical application.