农业工程学报
農業工程學報
농업공정학보
2013年
17期
72-79
,共8页
尹楠%姜琦刚%孟治国%李远华
尹楠%薑琦剛%孟治國%李遠華
윤남%강기강%맹치국%리원화
土壤湿度%模型%雷达图像%周期性地表%RADARSAT-2
土壤濕度%模型%雷達圖像%週期性地錶%RADARSAT-2
토양습도%모형%뢰체도상%주기성지표%RADARSAT-2
soil moisture%models%radar imaging%periodic surfaces%RADARSAT-2
土壤湿度是农作物估产和旱情监测的关键参量。目前常用的土壤湿度反演模型都建立在随机粗糙地表条件下,对周期性垄行结构的土壤并不适用。基于RADARSAT-2全极化数据和野外实测数据,分析了交叉极化(vh)后向散射系数对垄行方位角无明显响应;同极化(hh,vv)对方位角的响应为余弦函数,但在方位角为90o±2o位置易出现偏离曲线的异常高亮度值。通过雷达影像上采样点的实测值和 Oh 模型推算的理论值,拟合得到周期性地表和随机地表之间的误差函数,进而对同极化影像进行纠正。纠正后的同极化比(p)去除了方位角和异常值的影响,交叉极化比(q)受到异常值的影响。通过Oh模型中的p和vh对研究区的地表参数进行反演,17个检验点的验证结果表明,预测的土壤湿度平均相对误差为11.13%,标准差为0.0256 cm3/cm3;预测的均方根高度平均相对误差为13%,标准差为0.1315 cm。结果与随机粗糙地表土壤湿度和均方根高度的反演精度相当,证明了该模型的有效性。
土壤濕度是農作物估產和旱情鑑測的關鍵參量。目前常用的土壤濕度反縯模型都建立在隨機粗糙地錶條件下,對週期性壟行結構的土壤併不適用。基于RADARSAT-2全極化數據和野外實測數據,分析瞭交扠極化(vh)後嚮散射繫數對壟行方位角無明顯響應;同極化(hh,vv)對方位角的響應為餘絃函數,但在方位角為90o±2o位置易齣現偏離麯線的異常高亮度值。通過雷達影像上採樣點的實測值和 Oh 模型推算的理論值,擬閤得到週期性地錶和隨機地錶之間的誤差函數,進而對同極化影像進行糾正。糾正後的同極化比(p)去除瞭方位角和異常值的影響,交扠極化比(q)受到異常值的影響。通過Oh模型中的p和vh對研究區的地錶參數進行反縯,17箇檢驗點的驗證結果錶明,預測的土壤濕度平均相對誤差為11.13%,標準差為0.0256 cm3/cm3;預測的均方根高度平均相對誤差為13%,標準差為0.1315 cm。結果與隨機粗糙地錶土壤濕度和均方根高度的反縯精度相噹,證明瞭該模型的有效性。
토양습도시농작물고산화한정감측적관건삼량。목전상용적토양습도반연모형도건립재수궤조조지표조건하,대주기성롱행결구적토양병불괄용。기우RADARSAT-2전겁화수거화야외실측수거,분석료교차겁화(vh)후향산사계수대롱행방위각무명현향응;동겁화(hh,vv)대방위각적향응위여현함수,단재방위각위90o±2o위치역출현편리곡선적이상고량도치。통과뢰체영상상채양점적실측치화 Oh 모형추산적이론치,의합득도주기성지표화수궤지표지간적오차함수,진이대동겁화영상진행규정。규정후적동겁화비(p)거제료방위각화이상치적영향,교차겁화비(q)수도이상치적영향。통과Oh모형중적p화vh대연구구적지표삼수진행반연,17개검험점적험증결과표명,예측적토양습도평균상대오차위11.13%,표준차위0.0256 cm3/cm3;예측적균방근고도평균상대오차위13%,표준차위0.1315 cm。결과여수궤조조지표토양습도화균방근고도적반연정도상당,증명료해모형적유효성。
Apart from surface roughness and soil moisture, the azimuth angle of a crop row is also a contributing factor of the backscattering coefficients of periodic bare soil surfaces. The commonly used models for estimating soil moisture could be applied to randomly rough surfaces, but not periodic surfaces. Based on the fully polarimetric RADARSAT-2 and field sampling data, this paper analyzes the response of backscattering coefficients to the azimuth angles of the crop rows. The like-polarized (hh or vv) backscattering is very sensitive to azimuth angles, assuming trigonometric function. Abnormal high value appears at the position around 90o. Thus, adjustment to the like-polarized backscattering coefficients is needed in order to remove the influence from azimuth angles. The cross-polarized (vh) backscattering shows a random distribution, reacting insensitively to the changes of azimuth angles. Assuming that the backscattering coefficient from periodic surfaces is the result of a random function (related to soil moisture and root mean square height) results in adding a cosine function (related to azimuth angles). Thus, through the difference between backscattering coefficients measured by SAR and calculated by an Oh model, the fitting error functions were acquired and could be regarded as the difference between periodic surfaces and random rough surfaces, and then the like-polarized images could be corrected. The correlation coefficients between the corrected backscatter coefficients and soil moisture are 0.626 and 0.775 respectively in hh and vv polarization modes, which are significantly improved compared with the results before correction. The scatter of the corrected co-polarized ratio p was randomly distributed with no abnormal value around 90o. This proves that co-polarized ratio p could remove the effect of azimuth angles and abnormal value. While the cross-polarized radio q could remove the effect of azimuth angles to some extent, it was affected by the abnormal value around 90o. Finally, the soil moisture and root mean square height of the study area can be estimated by solving two equations (vh and p). This study selected 17 sampling points as checkpoints. The correlation coefficient between estimated soil moisture and measured soil moisture was up to 0.88, with the average relative error of 11.13% and the standard deviation of 0.0256 cm3/cm3. The correlation coefficient between estimated root mean square height and measured root mean square height was 0.76, with the average relative error of 13%and the standard deviation of 0.1315 cm. There was no significant difference in accuracy between the samples with azimuth angles of 90o and the other samples. The inversion accuracy of the corrected Oh model for periodic surfaces is very close to the models of randomly rough surfaces. The modified model is reliable and applicable for periodic surfaces.