天津医药
天津醫藥
천진의약
TIANJIN MEDICAL JOURNAL
2014年
4期
378-380
,共3页
陈俞涛%杨江伟%侯海斌%王春生%王坤正
陳俞濤%楊江偉%侯海斌%王春生%王坤正
진유도%양강위%후해빈%왕춘생%왕곤정
骨折固定术,内%股骨骨折%回顾性研究%股骨远端骨折%微创内固定系统%股骨髁支持钢板
骨摺固定術,內%股骨骨摺%迴顧性研究%股骨遠耑骨摺%微創內固定繫統%股骨髁支持鋼闆
골절고정술,내%고골골절%회고성연구%고골원단골절%미창내고정계통%고골과지지강판
fracture fixation,internal%femoral fractures%retrospective studies%distal femoral fractures%less invasive stabilization system%femoral condylar support plate
目的:探讨应用微创内固定系统(LISS)与股骨髁支持钢板治疗股骨远端C型骨折的并发症和早期临床效果疗效差异。方法回顾性分析46例行内固定的股骨远端C型骨折患者,其中25例行微创内固定系统内固定(LISS组),21例行股骨髁支持钢板内固定(髁钢板组),从手术相关指标、术后并发症及患侧膝关节功能评分对2种治疗方法进行比较分析。结果与髁钢板组相比,LISS组切口长度短,术中出血量少,骨折愈合所需时间短(P<0.05),2组手术时间、住院时间比较差异无统计学意义。LISS组内固定断裂1例。髁钢板组内固定松动、断裂各1例,术后4周发生感染1例,骨折不愈合1例,因患膝关节活动度降低行膝关节镜下松解术1例。LISS组Evanich评分总分为(90.6±3.3)分,高于髁钢板组的(81.2±1.8)分。结论 LISS是治疗股骨远端C型骨折的理想内固定方式。
目的:探討應用微創內固定繫統(LISS)與股骨髁支持鋼闆治療股骨遠耑C型骨摺的併髮癥和早期臨床效果療效差異。方法迴顧性分析46例行內固定的股骨遠耑C型骨摺患者,其中25例行微創內固定繫統內固定(LISS組),21例行股骨髁支持鋼闆內固定(髁鋼闆組),從手術相關指標、術後併髮癥及患側膝關節功能評分對2種治療方法進行比較分析。結果與髁鋼闆組相比,LISS組切口長度短,術中齣血量少,骨摺愈閤所需時間短(P<0.05),2組手術時間、住院時間比較差異無統計學意義。LISS組內固定斷裂1例。髁鋼闆組內固定鬆動、斷裂各1例,術後4週髮生感染1例,骨摺不愈閤1例,因患膝關節活動度降低行膝關節鏡下鬆解術1例。LISS組Evanich評分總分為(90.6±3.3)分,高于髁鋼闆組的(81.2±1.8)分。結論 LISS是治療股骨遠耑C型骨摺的理想內固定方式。
목적:탐토응용미창내고정계통(LISS)여고골과지지강판치료고골원단C형골절적병발증화조기림상효과료효차이。방법회고성분석46례행내고정적고골원단C형골절환자,기중25례행미창내고정계통내고정(LISS조),21례행고골과지지강판내고정(과강판조),종수술상관지표、술후병발증급환측슬관절공능평분대2충치료방법진행비교분석。결과여과강판조상비,LISS조절구장도단,술중출혈량소,골절유합소수시간단(P<0.05),2조수술시간、주원시간비교차이무통계학의의。LISS조내고정단렬1례。과강판조내고정송동、단렬각1례,술후4주발생감염1례,골절불유합1례,인환슬관절활동도강저행슬관절경하송해술1례。LISS조Evanich평분총분위(90.6±3.3)분,고우과강판조적(81.2±1.8)분。결론 LISS시치료고골원단C형골절적이상내고정방식。
Objective To summarize complications and early clinical effect of less invasive stabilization system and the femoral condylar support plates in treatment of AO type C distal femoral fractures. Methods We reviewed 46 patients who had internal fixation of AO type C distal femoral fractures. Of all 46 patients, 25 were with less invasive stabilization sys-tem and 21 were with femoral condylar support plates fixation. Comparative analysis was performed using intraoperative in-dex, postoperative complications and the Evanich score at follow-up. Results All 46 patients were followed up with a mean time of 19.6 months after surgery. The difference in incision length, blood loss, fracture healing time was significant between the 2 groups(P<0.05)but not in the duration of operations and hospital stays(P>0.05). The statistical signifi-cance was also found in the total incidence of postoperative complications and the Evanich score at the last follow-up(P<0.05). Conclusion Patients with less invasive stabilization system fixation had the characteristics of less trauma, shorter fracture healing time, less postoperative complications and better functional recovery compared with femoral condylar sup-port plates. Less invasive stabilization system had became an ideal internal fixation in treatment of AO type C distal femoral fractures.