中国康复理论与实践
中國康複理論與實踐
중국강복이론여실천
CHINESE JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION THEORY & PRACTICE
2014年
4期
367-370
,共4页
刘剑%张小年%张慧丽%张皓%迟茜茜%张欣%王荣荣%王晓艳
劉劍%張小年%張慧麗%張皓%遲茜茜%張訢%王榮榮%王曉豔
류검%장소년%장혜려%장호%지천천%장흔%왕영영%왕효염
颅脑创伤%认知障碍%简易精神状态检查%康复
顱腦創傷%認知障礙%簡易精神狀態檢查%康複
로뇌창상%인지장애%간역정신상태검사%강복
traumatic brain injury%cognitive impairment%Mini-Mental State Examination%rehabilitation
目的:探讨重度颅脑损伤患者简易精神状态检查(MMSE)评分的特点,分析年龄、损伤侧、损伤部位等因素对MMSE总分和各分项评分的影响。方法67例重度脑外伤患者,记录患者一般资料,并采用MMSE进行评分,分析结果。结果患者在回忆、定向、计算、书写与绘图方面平均得分相对较低,而在命名、记忆、复述、理解方面得分相对较高。45~65岁患者在MMSE总分和空间定向、阅读方面得分低于18~44岁患者(P<0.05)。与基底节损伤相比,额叶损伤在时间定向、空间定向、记忆和计算得分上有显著性差异(P<0.05);额颞顶叶损伤在MMSE总分、时间定向、空间定向、计算和绘图得分上有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论 MMSE可以在一定程度上反映脑外伤患者的认知障碍程度,年龄和损伤部位会影响患者的认知障碍程度。
目的:探討重度顱腦損傷患者簡易精神狀態檢查(MMSE)評分的特點,分析年齡、損傷側、損傷部位等因素對MMSE總分和各分項評分的影響。方法67例重度腦外傷患者,記錄患者一般資料,併採用MMSE進行評分,分析結果。結果患者在迴憶、定嚮、計算、書寫與繪圖方麵平均得分相對較低,而在命名、記憶、複述、理解方麵得分相對較高。45~65歲患者在MMSE總分和空間定嚮、閱讀方麵得分低于18~44歲患者(P<0.05)。與基底節損傷相比,額葉損傷在時間定嚮、空間定嚮、記憶和計算得分上有顯著性差異(P<0.05);額顳頂葉損傷在MMSE總分、時間定嚮、空間定嚮、計算和繪圖得分上有顯著性差異(P<0.05)。結論 MMSE可以在一定程度上反映腦外傷患者的認知障礙程度,年齡和損傷部位會影響患者的認知障礙程度。
목적:탐토중도로뇌손상환자간역정신상태검사(MMSE)평분적특점,분석년령、손상측、손상부위등인소대MMSE총분화각분항평분적영향。방법67례중도뇌외상환자,기록환자일반자료,병채용MMSE진행평분,분석결과。결과환자재회억、정향、계산、서사여회도방면평균득분상대교저,이재명명、기억、복술、리해방면득분상대교고。45~65세환자재MMSE총분화공간정향、열독방면득분저우18~44세환자(P<0.05)。여기저절손상상비,액협손상재시간정향、공간정향、기억화계산득분상유현저성차이(P<0.05);액섭정협손상재MMSE총분、시간정향、공간정향、계산화회도득분상유현저성차이(P<0.05)。결론 MMSE가이재일정정도상반영뇌외상환자적인지장애정도,년령화손상부위회영향환자적인지장애정도。
Objective To investigate the influence of age, injury side and injury area on Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores. Methods General data of 67 patients with severe traumatic brain injury were recorded, and they were assessed with MMSE. Results The scores were low in recalling, orientation, calculation, writing and drawing, while they were high in naming, memorizing, reiteration and comprehension. The total MMSE scores and the scores of space orientation and reading were lower in 45~65 years old patients than in 18~44 years old patients (P<0.05). There was significantly difference in time orientation, space orientation, recalling and calculation between basal ganglia injury and front lobes injury (P<0.05), as well as in total MMSE scores, time orientation, space orientation, calculation and drawing between basal ganglia injury and front, temporal and parietal lobes injury (P<0.05). Conclusion MMSE scores do reflect cognitive impairment in patients with traumatic brain injury, the specific age and injury area of the brain can influence the cognitive impairment in pa-tients.