城市交通
城市交通
성시교통
URBAN TRANSPORT OF CHINA
2014年
2期
84-94
,共11页
Elliot Fishman%Simon Washington%Narelle Haworth%张晓为(译)
Elliot Fishman%Simon Washington%Narelle Haworth%張曉為(譯)
Elliot Fishman%Simon Washington%Narelle Haworth%장효위(역)
公共自行车%自行车%自行车共享%交通%可持续%城市
公共自行車%自行車%自行車共享%交通%可持續%城市
공공자행차%자행차%자행차공향%교통%가지속%성시
public bicycle%bicycle%bike share%transport%sustainable%cities
对公共自行车系统进行总体概述,并针对相关文献进行批判性检验。基于以往同行评议文献及灰色文献,对与公共自行车系统影响相关的认知缺陷进行分析。当前亟须针对全球公共自行车研究进行评估,该综述旨在更好地了解及加强当前和未来公共自行车系统的实施效率。越来越多的研究聚焦于公共自行车系统,主要议题集中在以下方面。首先,公共自行车使用者认为方便性和低支出是注册并使用该系统的重要原因。其次,与固有观念相反,公共自行车系统用户比非用户更倾向于拥有和使用私人自行车。第三,当法律强制要求佩戴头盔时,公共自行车使用者比私人自行车使用者更不愿佩戴头盔。最后,从更重要的可持续交通角度而言,大量公共自行车系统使用者选择该方式取代可持续交通方式而非小汽车出行方式。
對公共自行車繫統進行總體概述,併針對相關文獻進行批判性檢驗。基于以往同行評議文獻及灰色文獻,對與公共自行車繫統影響相關的認知缺陷進行分析。噹前亟鬚針對全毬公共自行車研究進行評估,該綜述旨在更好地瞭解及加彊噹前和未來公共自行車繫統的實施效率。越來越多的研究聚焦于公共自行車繫統,主要議題集中在以下方麵。首先,公共自行車使用者認為方便性和低支齣是註冊併使用該繫統的重要原因。其次,與固有觀唸相反,公共自行車繫統用戶比非用戶更傾嚮于擁有和使用私人自行車。第三,噹法律彊製要求珮戴頭盔時,公共自行車使用者比私人自行車使用者更不願珮戴頭盔。最後,從更重要的可持續交通角度而言,大量公共自行車繫統使用者選擇該方式取代可持續交通方式而非小汽車齣行方式。
대공공자행차계통진행총체개술,병침대상관문헌진행비판성검험。기우이왕동행평의문헌급회색문헌,대여공공자행차계통영향상관적인지결함진행분석。당전극수침대전구공공자행차연구진행평고,해종술지재경호지료해급가강당전화미래공공자행차계통적실시효솔。월래월다적연구취초우공공자행차계통,주요의제집중재이하방면。수선,공공자행차사용자인위방편성화저지출시주책병사용해계통적중요원인。기차,여고유관념상반,공공자행차계통용호비비용호경경향우옹유화사용사인자행차。제삼,당법률강제요구패대두회시,공공자행차사용자비사인자행차사용자경불원패대두회。최후,종경중요적가지속교통각도이언,대량공공자행차계통사용자선택해방식취대가지속교통방식이비소기차출행방식。
This paper begins by providing an overview of bike share programs, followed by a critical exam-ination of the growing body of literature on these programs. This synthesis of previous works, both peer-re-viewed and gray, includes an identification of the current gaps in knowledge related to the impacts of bike sharing programs. This synthesis represents a critically needed evaluation of the current state of global bike share research, in order to better understand, and maximize the effectiveness of current and future pro-grams. Several consistent themes have emerged within the growing body of research on bike share pro-grams. Firstly, the importance bike share members place on convenience and value for money appears para-mount in their motivation to sign up and use these programs. Secondly, and somewhat counter intuitively, scheme members are more likely to own and use private bicycles than nonmembers. Thirdly, users demon-strate a greater reluctance to wear helmets than private bicycle riders and helmets have acted as a deterrent in jurisdictions in which helmets are mandatory. Finally, and perhaps most importantly from a sustainable transport perspective, the majority of scheme users are substituting from sustainable modes of transport rather than the car.