当代医药论丛
噹代醫藥論叢
당대의약론총
Contemporary Medicine Forum
2014年
4期
137-137
,共1页
B超%绝经%取环%临床研究
B超%絕經%取環%臨床研究
B초%절경%취배%림상연구
B ultrasound%menopause%intrauterine%clinical study
目的：探究用B超引导联合米非司酮取环手术为绝经后女性取环的临床效果。方法：将我站2013年1月至2014年1月收治的99例需取环的绝经后女性分为传统对照组、B超导视对照组及实验组（每组各33例患者），分别为其施行传统节育环取出手术、B超导视下节育环取出手术及B超引导联合米非司酮取环手术，对比分析其扩宫率、疼痛率、手术时间及出血量等指标。结果：与两组对照组患者相比，实验组患者的扩宫率、疼痛率较低，取环成功率较高，差异显著（P＜0.05），有统计学意义。三组患者的平均手术时间、平均出血量等指标相比较，无显著性差异（P＞0.05）。结论：用B超引导联合米非司酮法为绝经后女性取环的成功率较高，而且可有效降低其扩宫率及发生疼痛等并发症的几率，值得在临床上推广使用。
目的：探究用B超引導聯閤米非司酮取環手術為絕經後女性取環的臨床效果。方法：將我站2013年1月至2014年1月收治的99例需取環的絕經後女性分為傳統對照組、B超導視對照組及實驗組（每組各33例患者），分彆為其施行傳統節育環取齣手術、B超導視下節育環取齣手術及B超引導聯閤米非司酮取環手術，對比分析其擴宮率、疼痛率、手術時間及齣血量等指標。結果：與兩組對照組患者相比，實驗組患者的擴宮率、疼痛率較低，取環成功率較高，差異顯著（P＜0.05），有統計學意義。三組患者的平均手術時間、平均齣血量等指標相比較，無顯著性差異（P＞0.05）。結論：用B超引導聯閤米非司酮法為絕經後女性取環的成功率較高，而且可有效降低其擴宮率及髮生疼痛等併髮癥的幾率，值得在臨床上推廣使用。
목적：탐구용B초인도연합미비사동취배수술위절경후녀성취배적림상효과。방법：장아참2013년1월지2014년1월수치적99례수취배적절경후녀성분위전통대조조、B초도시대조조급실험조（매조각33례환자），분별위기시행전통절육배취출수술、B초도시하절육배취출수술급B초인도연합미비사동취배수술，대비분석기확궁솔、동통솔、수술시간급출혈량등지표。결과：여량조대조조환자상비，실험조환자적확궁솔、동통솔교저，취배성공솔교고，차이현저（P＜0.05），유통계학의의。삼조환자적평균수술시간、평균출혈량등지표상비교，무현저성차이（P＞0.05）。결론：용B초인도연합미비사동법위절경후녀성취배적성공솔교고，이차가유효강저기확궁솔급발생동통등병발증적궤솔，치득재림상상추엄사용。
Objective To explore the effect of B ultrasound guide ring off in postmenopausal women, the combined effect of mifepristone in B ultrasoundguided menopause after the ring. Methods:I stand postmenopausal ring in 99cases were divided into three groups, using comparative analysis of traditionaloperation extraction ring [1], B ultrasound guided by taking ring operation and B ultrasound guided combined with mifepristone for ring operation, each group of 33 people, of which the traditional ring extraction and B ultrasound guide ring extraction as control group, B ultrasound guided joint mifepristone were as the experimental group, the success rate for ring, dilation rate, pain rate, operation time and bleeding volume as the contrast index. Results: compared to observationgroup and experimental group, experimental group and observation in the uterus dilating rate, pain rate has significant difference (P<0.05), the other is notsignificant difference (P>0.05), not comparable. Among the three groups in thesuccess rate for ring, dilation rate, pain rate, average operation time, average bleeding volume and other indicators have obvious difference (P < 0.05), with comparable. Conclusion: B ultrasound guidance combined with mifepristone underpostmenopausal ring success rate is much higher than the other two methods, thecomplications are few, should be popularized in clinical medicine.
