CAJ | 학술논문

系统评述美国医疗机构评审国际联合委员会、德国医院透明管理制度与标准委员会、泰国医院质量改进与认证研究所3个有代表性的国外医疗机构评审模式、评审方法、评审特色等。结合我国医疗机构评审现状，建议我国新一轮医疗机构评审引入“第三方”评审主体，促进医疗机构主动参评，推动评审后持续改进，巩固“三级医疗网”，引导群众有序就医等政策。
계통평술미국의료궤구평심국제연합위원회、덕국의원투명관리제도여표준위원회、태국의원질량개진여인증연구소3개유대표성적국외의료궤구평심모식、평심방법、평심특색등。결합아국의료궤구평심현상，건의아국신일륜의료궤구평심인입“제삼방”평심주체，촉진의료궤구주동삼평，추동평심후지속개진，공고“삼급의료망”，인도군음유서취의등정책。
In this study, we systematically studied the modes, methods and characteristics of Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health-care Organizations of the United States, hospital transparent management system in Germany, Hospital Quality Improvement and Accreditation In-stitute of Thailand, which are three representatives of the healthcare organization accreditation of foreign countries.Combining the reality of healthcare organization accreditation in China, we propose several suggestions, namely introducing the third-party as accreditation body, encour-aging the active participation of healthcare organization, promoting continuous improvement after accreditation and bettering the three -tertiary healthcare network for people to utilize the medical resource rationally .