四川医学
四川醫學
사천의학
SICHUAN MEDICAL JOURNAL
2014年
6期
641-644
,共4页
孙明伟%曾俊%蔡斌%江华%王文渊%胡卫建
孫明偉%曾俊%蔡斌%江華%王文淵%鬍衛建
손명위%증준%채빈%강화%왕문연%호위건
地震%系统评价%循证医学%灾难医学
地震%繫統評價%循證醫學%災難醫學
지진%계통평개%순증의학%재난의학
earthquake%systematic review%evidence-based medicine%disaster medicine
目的:系统评价2008年至2012年间中国学者发表的地震灾难救援临床研究的现状。方法基于循证医学系统评价的方法,建立系统的研究标准和检索策略,对6个中英文医学期刊数据库进行文献检索。按照标准的文献筛选流程,并采用质性研究方法,对研究方法和研究内容进行质量评估分析和筛选。结果通过系统性的检索中英文专业期刊数据库,检索获得165篇文献中,11篇(6.67%)存在明显的方法学和/或统计学错误;研究对象类似的描述性分析共计128篇(77.58%);样本量过小或仅为病案报告的研究共20篇(12.12%)。高质量论文6篇。结论我国地震灾难医学救援临床研究经过多年发展,逐步取得了很多成绩。但整体研究水平仍有待提高,亟需完善建立医学救援数据库,引入数据挖掘的理论和技术工具,为应对未来的灾难做好准备。
目的:繫統評價2008年至2012年間中國學者髮錶的地震災難救援臨床研究的現狀。方法基于循證醫學繫統評價的方法,建立繫統的研究標準和檢索策略,對6箇中英文醫學期刊數據庫進行文獻檢索。按照標準的文獻篩選流程,併採用質性研究方法,對研究方法和研究內容進行質量評估分析和篩選。結果通過繫統性的檢索中英文專業期刊數據庫,檢索穫得165篇文獻中,11篇(6.67%)存在明顯的方法學和/或統計學錯誤;研究對象類似的描述性分析共計128篇(77.58%);樣本量過小或僅為病案報告的研究共20篇(12.12%)。高質量論文6篇。結論我國地震災難醫學救援臨床研究經過多年髮展,逐步取得瞭很多成績。但整體研究水平仍有待提高,亟需完善建立醫學救援數據庫,引入數據挖掘的理論和技術工具,為應對未來的災難做好準備。
목적:계통평개2008년지2012년간중국학자발표적지진재난구원림상연구적현상。방법기우순증의학계통평개적방법,건립계통적연구표준화검색책략,대6개중영문의학기간수거고진행문헌검색。안조표준적문헌사선류정,병채용질성연구방법,대연구방법화연구내용진행질량평고분석화사선。결과통과계통성적검색중영문전업기간수거고,검색획득165편문헌중,11편(6.67%)존재명현적방법학화/혹통계학착오;연구대상유사적묘술성분석공계128편(77.58%);양본량과소혹부위병안보고적연구공20편(12.12%)。고질량논문6편。결론아국지진재난의학구원림상연구경과다년발전,축보취득료흔다성적。단정체연구수평잉유대제고,극수완선건립의학구원수거고,인입수거알굴적이론화기술공구,위응대미래적재난주호준비。
Objective Evaluated the status of earthquake related clinical research from China. Methods Based on the principles and process of evidence-based medicine systematic review, we established a systematical research standard and strategy to search the literatures on 6 chinese and english medical journals databases. According to the standard literature search process, we used the qualitative analysis to screen and evaluate quality of these studies’ methods and contents. Results Through the sys-tematical research on the databases, we got 165 literatures meted study inclusion criteria. There were 165 literatures included, 11 (6. 67%) studieswith the significant Methodological and/or statistical error, 128 ( 77. 58%) descriptive researches and 20 (12. 12%) studies with the smaller samples or only case report. After the quality systematical review, we got 6 high quality litera-tures at all. Conclusion From 2008 to 2012 Chinese authors used to issue many descriptive researches. The Chinese literatures were decreasing after 2009 but the English literatures were increasing year by year. And most of literatures were lacking of deep data analysis, data mining or creative study. Based on these evidences, we suggested our authors couldfocus on the data analysi-sand quality control, and keep the attention closely on the earthquake clinical study not only the English Journals but also the do-mestic Chinese Journals.