CAJ | 학술논문

目的：比较ROCHE URYSIS-2400尿液干化学分析仪（简称URYSIS-2400）和AIKELAI AX-4030尿液干化学分析仪（简称AX-4030）的检测结果的一致性。方法分别用URYSIS-2400和AX-4030平行测定500例尿液常规标本，比较检测结果的阳性检出率和符合率。随机选取250例使用尿沉渣显微镜复核尿红细胞（ERY）和白细胞（LEU）。通过添加实验评估 URYSIS-2400、AX-4030抗维生素 C 干扰的能力。结果2台仪器比重（SG）差异百分率均值＜1％，其余9项干化学检测项目一般符合率都＞90％。URYSIS-2400和AX-4030 ERY项目与尿沉渣显微镜计数的符合率分别为82．4％、84．4％，LEU分别为76．0％和83．2％。URYSIS-2400、AX-4030葡萄糖（GLU）和ERY项目添加维生素C浓度达50 mg/dL时不受干扰。结论 URYSIS-2400和AX-4030检测结果一致性良好，但尿液干化学分析仪只是筛检仪器，还应结合显微镜尿沉渣计数复核的结果以满足临床需要。
목적：비교ROCHE URYSIS-2400뇨액간화학분석의（간칭URYSIS-2400）화AIKELAI AX-4030뇨액간화학분석의（간칭AX-4030）적검측결과적일치성。방법분별용URYSIS-2400화AX-4030평행측정500례뇨액상규표본，비교검측결과적양성검출솔화부합솔。수궤선취250례사용뇨침사현미경복핵뇨홍세포（ERY）화백세포（LEU）。통과첨가실험평고 URYSIS-2400、AX-4030항유생소 C 간우적능력。결과2태의기비중（SG）차이백분솔균치＜1％，기여9항간화학검측항목일반부합솔도＞90％。URYSIS-2400화AX-4030 ERY항목여뇨침사현미경계수적부합솔분별위82．4％、84．4％，LEU분별위76．0％화83．2％。URYSIS-2400、AX-4030포도당（GLU）화ERY항목첨가유생소C농도체50 mg/dL시불수간우。결론 URYSIS-2400화AX-4030검측결과일치성량호，단뇨액간화학분석의지시사검의기，환응결합현미경뇨침사계수복핵적결과이만족림상수요。
Objective To compare the consistency of ROCHE URYSIS-2400 and AIKELAI AX-4030 urine dry-chemistry analyzers.Methods A total of 500 urine specimens were detected by the 2 kinds of urine chemistry analyzers in parallel,and the results were analyzed statistically by positive detection rates and accordance rates.A total of 250 cases were randomly selected for reviewing erythrocytes (ERY)and leulcocytes (LEU)by urine sediment microscopy. Experiments by adding vitamin C were used to evaluate URYSIS-2400 and AX-4030 anti-interference abilities against vitamin C.Results The mean difference percentage of specific gravity (SG)between the 2 analyzers was <1%,and all the general consistency rates of the remaining 9 projects were >90%.The consistency rates of URYSIS-2400 and AX-4030 were 82.4% and 84.4% with urine sediment microscopy on ERY,and 76.0% and 83.2% on LEU. URYSIS-2400 and AX-4030 anti-interference abilities against vitamin C were up to 50mg/dL on glucose (GLU)and ERY.Conclusions There is a good consistency between the results of URYSIS-2400 and AX-4030,but urine chemistry analyzer is used only for screening,and the results should be reviewed by urine sediment microscopy in order to meet clinical needs.